What is the HINTS (Head-Impulse Nystagmus Test of Skew) examination?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 21, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

The HINTS Examination: A Critical Bedside Test for Differentiating Central from Peripheral Vertigo

The HINTS (Head-Impulse, Nystagmus, Test of Skew) examination is a highly sensitive and specific bedside test that distinguishes between peripheral and central causes of vertigo, with its primary value being the early detection of potentially life-threatening stroke in patients with acute vestibular syndrome (AVS). 1

Components of the HINTS Examination

The HINTS examination consists of three specific components:

  1. Head Impulse Test (HIT):

    • Examiner rapidly turns the patient's head to one side while patient fixates on a target
    • Normal response (positive test): Eyes remain fixed on target (intact VOR)
    • Abnormal response (negative test): Eyes move with head, requiring catch-up saccade to refixate
    • Interpretation: Abnormal HIT suggests peripheral cause; normal HIT with AVS suggests central cause
  2. Nystagmus Assessment:

    • Examiner observes for direction-changing nystagmus in different gaze positions
    • Peripheral pattern: Unidirectional nystagmus that increases when looking in direction of fast phase
    • Central pattern: Direction-changing nystagmus or vertical nystagmus
    • Interpretation: Direction-changing nystagmus suggests central cause
  3. Test of Skew:

    • Examiner performs alternate cover test to detect vertical misalignment
    • Normal: No vertical movement when covering/uncovering eyes
    • Abnormal: Vertical refixation movement (skew deviation)
    • Interpretation: Presence of skew deviation suggests central cause

Diagnostic Value

When properly performed by trained clinicians, HINTS offers remarkable diagnostic power:

  • Higher sensitivity for stroke detection than early MRI (100% versus 46%) 1
  • For peripheral vertigo diagnosis: Sensitivity 94.0% and specificity 86.9% 2
  • For central vertigo diagnosis: Positive likelihood ratio 5.61 and negative likelihood ratio 0.06 3

Clinical Application

The HINTS examination is particularly valuable because:

  • Up to 75-80% of patients with AVS related to stroke have no associated focal neurologic deficits 4
  • The prevalence of cerebrovascular disease in AVS patients is approximately 25% and up to 75% in high vascular risk cohorts 4

Interpretation Pattern

A central cause of vertigo is suggested by any one of the following ("INFARCT" pattern):

  • Impulse normal (no corrective saccade)
  • Nystagmus that changes direction with gaze
  • Fast-phase Alternating Refixation on Cover Test (skew deviation)

Important Caveats

  1. Examiner expertise matters significantly:

    • When performed by neurologists: Sensitivity 96.7%, specificity 94.8% 5
    • When performed by mixed physician groups including emergency physicians: Sensitivity 83%, specificity 44% 5
    • Most emergency physicians haven't received specialized training in HINTS 1
  2. False positives in peripheral disorders:

    • Up to 54% of patients with confirmed peripheral vestibulopathy may show positive HINTS signs 6
    • Careful interpretation is required in clinical context
  3. HINTS Plus:

    • Adds assessment of hearing (finger rub at ear)
    • Sudden hearing loss suggests central cause
    • Improves sensitivity to 95.3% and specificity to 72.9% 2

Clinical Decision Making

  1. When to use HINTS:

    • Only in patients with true acute vestibular syndrome (continuous vertigo >24h with nausea/vomiting, nystagmus)
    • Not appropriate for episodic vertigo, positional vertigo, or non-vestibular dizziness
  2. When to trust HINTS results:

    • When performed by specially trained providers 4
    • When all three components are assessed properly
    • When results show a consistent pattern
  3. When to proceed to neuroimaging despite HINTS:

    • Inconsistent HINTS findings
    • Examination performed by untrained providers
    • High clinical suspicion despite reassuring HINTS
    • Presence of other neurological signs or symptoms

Implementation Recommendations

  • Specialized training is essential for accurate HINTS performance
  • Consider video-assisted HINTS for improved accuracy and documentation
  • Integrate HINTS into stroke protocols in emergency departments
  • Use HINTS as part of a comprehensive evaluation, not in isolation

The HINTS examination represents a powerful clinical tool that, when properly performed and interpreted, can significantly improve early detection of central causes of vertigo and potentially reduce unnecessary neuroimaging in patients with peripheral vertigo.

References

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.