What are the potential complications of esophageal stenting and how are they managed?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 22, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Complications of Esophageal Stenting and Their Management

The most common complications of esophageal stenting include stent migration (occurring in up to 30% of cases), chest pain (15.6%), tumor ingrowth/overgrowth, and rarely esophageal perforation (1.5%), with management strategies tailored to each specific complication. 1

Major Complications and Their Management

1. Stent Migration

  • Incidence: 16-30% of cases, higher with fully covered stents 1, 2
  • Risk factors:
    • Fully covered stents (higher migration rates than partially covered or uncovered)
    • Prior radiation or chemotherapy 3
    • Placement in proximal esophagus 2
  • Management:
    • Endoscopic repositioning or removal
    • Consider stent fixation techniques (endoclips, endosuturing) for high-risk locations 4
    • For recurrent migration, consider changing to a partially covered stent or stent with anti-migration features

2. Pain and Discomfort

  • Incidence: 15.6% of patients 1
  • Management:
    • Analgesics (start with non-opioids, escalate as needed)
    • If severe and uncontrolled, stent removal is indicated as an emergency procedure 1
    • Consider stent repositioning if pain is due to improper placement

3. Tumor Ingrowth/Overgrowth

  • Incidence: 2.2% for ingrowth; overgrowth rates vary 1
  • Risk factors: Uncovered or partially covered stents
  • Management:
    • For ingrowth: Laser therapy, argon plasma coagulation, or placement of a second covered stent
    • For overgrowth: Placement of a second stent or endoscopic debulking

4. Perforation

  • Incidence: 0-2% with metal stents; higher (6-8%) with plastic stents 1
  • Risk factors:
    • Prior radiation (increases risk 25.7-fold) 3
    • Ultraflex stent type (19.6-fold increased risk) 3
    • Blind bougie dilation before stenting 1
  • Management:
    • Immediate surgical consultation
    • NPO status, broad-spectrum antibiotics
    • Covered stent placement for contained perforations
    • Surgical repair for large perforations with mediastinal contamination 5
    • Close monitoring with serial imaging

5. Hemorrhage

  • Incidence: 4-13% 1, 2
  • Management:
    • Endoscopic intervention with electrocoagulation techniques (bipolar or argon plasma coagulation) 1
    • For severe bleeding, consider angiographic embolization
    • Caution with endoscopic assessment if aortoesophageal fistula is suspected 1

6. Food Bolus Obstruction

  • Incidence: Variable
  • Management:
    • Endoscopic removal of food impaction
    • Patient education on proper food consistency and thorough chewing

Special Considerations

Patients with Prior Treatment

  • Prior chemotherapy increases complication risk 6.13-fold 3
  • Prior radiation increases major complication risk 25.7-fold 3
  • Consider alternative approaches in these high-risk patients

Stent Selection

  • Fully covered self-expandable metal stents (FCSEMS) are preferred for malignant and benign dysphagia 6
  • Ultraflex stents are associated with higher complication rates (OR 6.81) 3
  • For tracheoesophageal fistulas, covered stents show 70-100% initial success in occlusion 1

Post-Stent Care

  • Monitor for fever, tachycardia, or increasing pain (signs of perforation) 1
  • Provide written instructions to patients to return if they develop pain, breathlessness, or become unwell 1
  • Initial diet should be liquids, progressing as tolerated
  • Consider proton pump inhibitors to reduce reflux symptoms

Prevention Strategies

  1. Careful patient selection through multidisciplinary review 1
  2. Appropriate stent selection based on location and patient characteristics
  3. Avoid stent placement in patients who have received or will receive radical radiotherapy if possible 1
  4. Consider enteral feeding alternatives in patients who will undergo neoadjuvant therapy 1
  5. Use fluoroscopic guidance during placement to minimize risk of perforation
  6. Proper sizing of stent diameter relative to stricture

By understanding these complications and their management strategies, clinicians can optimize outcomes for patients requiring esophageal stenting while minimizing morbidity and mortality.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.