Complications of Esophageal Stenting and Their Management
The most common complications of esophageal stenting include stent migration (occurring in up to 30% of cases), chest pain (15.6%), tumor ingrowth/overgrowth, and rarely esophageal perforation (1.5%), with management strategies tailored to each specific complication. 1
Major Complications and Their Management
1. Stent Migration
- Incidence: 16-30% of cases, higher with fully covered stents 1, 2
- Risk factors:
- Management:
- Endoscopic repositioning or removal
- Consider stent fixation techniques (endoclips, endosuturing) for high-risk locations 4
- For recurrent migration, consider changing to a partially covered stent or stent with anti-migration features
2. Pain and Discomfort
- Incidence: 15.6% of patients 1
- Management:
- Analgesics (start with non-opioids, escalate as needed)
- If severe and uncontrolled, stent removal is indicated as an emergency procedure 1
- Consider stent repositioning if pain is due to improper placement
3. Tumor Ingrowth/Overgrowth
- Incidence: 2.2% for ingrowth; overgrowth rates vary 1
- Risk factors: Uncovered or partially covered stents
- Management:
- For ingrowth: Laser therapy, argon plasma coagulation, or placement of a second covered stent
- For overgrowth: Placement of a second stent or endoscopic debulking
4. Perforation
- Incidence: 0-2% with metal stents; higher (6-8%) with plastic stents 1
- Risk factors:
- Management:
- Immediate surgical consultation
- NPO status, broad-spectrum antibiotics
- Covered stent placement for contained perforations
- Surgical repair for large perforations with mediastinal contamination 5
- Close monitoring with serial imaging
5. Hemorrhage
6. Food Bolus Obstruction
- Incidence: Variable
- Management:
- Endoscopic removal of food impaction
- Patient education on proper food consistency and thorough chewing
Special Considerations
Patients with Prior Treatment
- Prior chemotherapy increases complication risk 6.13-fold 3
- Prior radiation increases major complication risk 25.7-fold 3
- Consider alternative approaches in these high-risk patients
Stent Selection
- Fully covered self-expandable metal stents (FCSEMS) are preferred for malignant and benign dysphagia 6
- Ultraflex stents are associated with higher complication rates (OR 6.81) 3
- For tracheoesophageal fistulas, covered stents show 70-100% initial success in occlusion 1
Post-Stent Care
- Monitor for fever, tachycardia, or increasing pain (signs of perforation) 1
- Provide written instructions to patients to return if they develop pain, breathlessness, or become unwell 1
- Initial diet should be liquids, progressing as tolerated
- Consider proton pump inhibitors to reduce reflux symptoms
Prevention Strategies
- Careful patient selection through multidisciplinary review 1
- Appropriate stent selection based on location and patient characteristics
- Avoid stent placement in patients who have received or will receive radical radiotherapy if possible 1
- Consider enteral feeding alternatives in patients who will undergo neoadjuvant therapy 1
- Use fluoroscopic guidance during placement to minimize risk of perforation
- Proper sizing of stent diameter relative to stricture
By understanding these complications and their management strategies, clinicians can optimize outcomes for patients requiring esophageal stenting while minimizing morbidity and mortality.