What are common examples of triple therapy inhalers for COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) patients with raised eosinophils?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 23, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Common Triple Therapy Inhalers for COPD with Raised Eosinophils

Single-inhaler triple therapy (SITT) containing LAMA/LABA/ICS is the recommended treatment for COPD patients with raised eosinophils (≥300 cells/μL) who are at high risk of exacerbations. 1, 2

Available Triple Therapy Options

FDA-Approved Single-Inhaler Triple Therapies:

  • Fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI)

    • Once-daily dosing
    • Particularly beneficial for patients with blood eosinophil counts ≥300 cells/μL
    • Demonstrated mortality benefit in the ETHOS study 1, 3
  • Budesonide/formoterol/glycopyrronium

    • Multiple daily dosing
    • Effective for patients with frequent exacerbations and elevated eosinophils 4
  • Beclometasone/formoterol/glycopyrronium

    • Multiple daily dosing
    • Suitable for patients with severe COPD and eosinophilic inflammation 4

Patient Selection for Triple Therapy

Triple therapy is particularly indicated for:

  • Patients with blood eosinophil counts ≥300 cells/μL 1, 2
  • Those with frequent exacerbations despite dual therapy 1
  • Patients with COPD-asthma overlap syndrome 2, 4
  • Individuals with severe to very severe COPD 4

Clinical Benefits of Triple Therapy in Eosinophilic COPD

  • Exacerbation reduction: NNT=4 to prevent one moderate-severe exacerbation per year 1
  • Mortality benefit: Demonstrated with moderate-dose ICS in triple therapy 1
  • Improved lung function: Greater improvements in FEV1 compared to dual therapies 5, 3
  • Enhanced quality of life: Better symptom control and health status 5

Important Considerations

Efficacy

  • Single-inhaler triple therapy shows incremental benefits compared to multiple-inhaler triple therapy 1
  • Moderate-dose ICS in triple therapy provides mortality benefit without increased exacerbation reduction compared to low-dose ICS 1

Safety

  • Pneumonia risk: Higher with ICS-containing regimens (NNH=33) 1, 2
  • The risk-benefit ratio favors triple therapy in appropriate patients (NNT=4 vs NNH=33) 1
  • Pneumonia is recognized as a class effect of ICS-containing therapies 1

Treatment Persistence

  • Do not withdraw ICS in patients with blood eosinophil counts ≥300 cells/μL 1, 2
  • Withdrawing ICS can worsen health status, lung function, and increase exacerbation risk, especially in those with elevated eosinophils 1

When Triple Therapy May Not Be Appropriate

  • Patients with blood eosinophil counts <100 cells/μL may not benefit significantly from the ICS component 2
  • Low risk of exacerbations (no history in past year) 2
  • Significant ICS-related adverse effects 2

Additional Therapies for Refractory Cases

For patients who continue to exacerbate despite triple therapy:

  • Consider adding macrolide maintenance therapy (e.g., azithromycin) in appropriate patients with normal QT interval 1, 2
  • Alternative options include roflumilast or N-acetylcysteine, especially for those with chronic bronchitic phenotype 1

Triple therapy represents an important treatment option for COPD patients with elevated eosinophils, offering significant benefits in reducing exacerbations and mortality when used appropriately.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.