Metastasis-Directed Therapy Options in Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer
Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) is the preferred metastasis-directed therapy for patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer, particularly those with ≤3 metastases, as it can delay the need for systemic therapy while maintaining quality of life. 1
Definition of Oligometastatic Disease
Oligometastatic prostate cancer is generally defined as having a limited number of metastases, with consensus (85% of experts) defining it as ≤3 synchronous metastases in bone and/or lymph nodes 1. This state represents a transitional phase between localized and widespread metastatic disease where targeted therapies may be beneficial.
Metastasis-Directed Therapy (MDT) Options
1. Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy (SABR)
- Primary option for oligometastatic lesions
- Advantages:
- Evidence from randomized trials:
2. Surgical Options
- Salvage lymph node dissection (sLND)
- For patients with nodal-only recurrence
- Can include extended bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection
- May improve second-line systemic therapy-free survival 1
- Higher morbidity compared to SABR
- Consider only in highly selected patients
3. Combined Approaches
- MDT + short-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)
- Recommended in a minority of selected patients 1
- May improve disease control compared to MDT alone
Clinical Scenarios for MDT Application
1. Synchronous (De Novo) Oligometastatic Disease
- Detected at time of initial diagnosis
- Treatment options:
2. Metachronous (Recurrent) Oligometastatic Disease
- Detected after treatment of primary tumor
- Higher risk of progression compared to synchronous disease (HR 4.50) 3
- Treatment options:
- MDT to delay initiation of systemic therapy
- MDT + short-term ADT (recommended by 46% of experts for selected patients) 1
3. Oligoprogressive Disease
- Limited sites progressing despite otherwise effective systemic therapy
- SABR can extend progression-free survival by approximately 9 months 1
- Can delay need to switch systemic therapy by approximately 12.6 months 1
Patient Selection Factors
- Number of metastases: ≤3 metastases shows best outcomes 1
- PSA doubling time: <4 months predicts worse outcomes 3
- Location of metastases:
- Bone metastases: SABR preferred
- Lymph node metastases: Either SABR or sLND
- Prior treatments and response
- Performance status and comorbidities
Imaging Considerations
- Advanced imaging (PET/CT) detects more lesions than conventional imaging 1
- Common PET tracers:
- 11C-choline PET
- PSMA-PET (higher sensitivity)
- Appropriate imaging is crucial for accurate staging and treatment planning
Pitfalls and Caveats
Underestimation of disease burden:
- Conventional imaging may miss micrometastases
- Consider more sensitive imaging modalities before MDT
Patient expectations:
- MDT is not curative but aims to delay systemic therapy and improve quality of life
- Progression is expected in most patients within 1-3 years 4
Toxicity considerations:
- While generally well-tolerated, SABR can cause site-specific toxicities
- Surgical approaches have higher morbidity than radiation-based MDT
Evidence limitations:
- Most data comes from small phase II trials and retrospective series
- No definitive overall survival benefit has been demonstrated
- Current recommendations are based on progression-free and ADT-free survival benefits
Treatment Algorithm
Confirm oligometastatic status:
- Advanced imaging (PSMA-PET preferred if available)
- ≤3-5 metastatic lesions
Assess patient factors:
- PSA doubling time (worse if <4 months)
- Performance status
- Prior treatments
Select MDT approach:
- For most patients: SABR to all visible metastases
- For selected patients with nodal-only disease: Consider sLND
- Consider adding short-term ADT in higher risk patients
Follow-up:
- PSA monitoring
- Repeat imaging when clinically indicated
- Be prepared to initiate systemic therapy when needed
MDT represents a promising approach for selected patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer, with the potential to delay systemic therapy while maintaining quality of life. However, patients should understand that this is typically not a curative approach but rather one that may extend the time to requiring systemic treatments.