How do you manage conditions affecting the right ventricular (RV) apex versus the conus?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 24, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of Right Ventricular Apex vs. Conus Conditions

The management of right ventricular (RV) conditions should be tailored to the specific anatomical location involved, with conditions affecting the RV apex requiring different approaches than those affecting the RV outflow tract (conus). 1

Anatomical and Functional Differences

RV Apex

  • Part of the trabeculated inflow portion of the RV
  • Primarily involved in RV contractile function
  • More commonly affected in:
    • RV infarction (usually from right coronary artery occlusion)
    • Apical muscular ventricular septal defects
    • Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC)

RV Conus (Outflow Tract)

  • Smooth-walled infundibular region
  • Embryologically distinct from the RV apex (derived from secondary heart field)
  • More commonly involved in:
    • Congenital heart defects (tetralogy of Fallot, double-chambered RV)
    • RV outflow tract obstruction
    • RV outflow tract ventricular tachycardia

Diagnostic Approach

Imaging Assessment

  • Echocardiography: First-line imaging but has limitations for RV assessment 1

    • Multiple views needed to visualize both apex and conus regions
    • 3D echocardiography provides better assessment of complex RV geometry
  • Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR): Gold standard for RV assessment 1

    • Recommended for quantitative assessment of RV size and function
    • Essential for patients with RV enlargement or dysfunction
    • Provides accurate tissue characterization (fibrosis, fat infiltration)
    • Superior for distinguishing between apex and conus pathologies
  • Cardiac CT: Useful when CMR is contraindicated 1

    • Provides detailed anatomical information
    • Helpful for coronary anomalies assessment
  • Electrocardiogram (ECG): Essential for baseline assessment 1

    • Specific patterns may indicate location of pathology
    • Serial ECGs recommended for monitoring disease progression

Management of Specific Conditions

RV Apex Conditions

RV Infarction

  • Occurs almost exclusively with inferior MI (proximal right coronary artery occlusion) 1
  • Management:
    • Volume loading with IV normal saline to maintain RV preload
    • Avoid nitrates and diuretics which reduce preload
    • Consider reperfusion therapy (high priority due to 25-30% mortality)
    • Inotropic support if hypotension persists despite volume loading
    • Temporary pacing for bradyarrhythmias or heart block

Apical Muscular Ventricular Septal Defects

  • May communicate between LV apex and RV infundibular apex 2
  • Management:
    • Transcatheter device closure when feasible
    • Surgical repair for large defects or when transcatheter approach fails

Arrhythmogenic RV Cardiomyopathy with Apical Involvement

  • Management: 3
    • Beta blockers as first-line therapy
    • ICD for patients with survived cardiac arrest or sustained VT
    • Catheter ablation for recurrent VT despite medical therapy
    • Heart transplantation for end-stage disease

RV Conus (Outflow Tract) Conditions

RV Outflow Tract Obstruction

  • Management: 3
    • Surgical resection for subvalvular obstruction
    • Balloon valvuloplasty for valvular pulmonic stenosis
    • Pulmonary valve replacement for severe regurgitation

RV Outflow Tract Ventricular Tachycardia

  • Management: 3
    • Beta blockers as first-line therapy
    • Calcium channel blockers as alternative
    • Catheter ablation for drug-refractory cases (high success rate)

Tetralogy of Fallot (Post-repair)

  • Abnormal contraction pattern with diminished function at base and increased function at apex 4
  • Management:
    • Regular CMR monitoring of RV size and function 1
    • Pulmonary valve replacement for severe pulmonary regurgitation
    • Antiarrhythmic therapy and/or ablation for ventricular arrhythmias
    • ICD for high-risk patients

Management of RV Failure

Acute RV Failure

  • Management strategy based on underlying cause: 1, 3
    • For pressure overload: Optimize ventilator settings, pulmonary vasodilators
    • For volume overload: Judicious diuresis, address underlying valvular issues
    • For RV contractile dysfunction: Inotropic support (dobutamine, milrinone)
    • For refractory cases: Mechanical circulatory support (ECMO, RV assist devices)

Chronic RV Failure

  • Management: 1, 3
    • Heart failure medications (ACE inhibitors, beta blockers)
    • Diuretics for volume overload symptoms
    • Pulmonary vasodilators for pulmonary hypertension
    • Cardiac resynchronization therapy for electrical dyssynchrony
    • Heart transplantation for end-stage disease

Common Pitfalls and Caveats

  1. Misdiagnosis: The complex geometry of the RV makes accurate assessment challenging; CMR is recommended when echocardiography is inconclusive 1

  2. Inappropriate preload reduction: Nitrates and diuretics can be detrimental in RV infarction by reducing preload 1

  3. Overlooking RV dysfunction: RV dysfunction is associated with poor outcomes across multiple conditions, with up to 45% two-year mortality in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction 3

  4. Inadequate imaging: Standard echocardiographic views may miss RV pathology; multiple views and 3D imaging are often necessary 1

  5. Failure to recognize anatomical variations: The RV has three compartments (inlet, apex, and outlet) with distinct embryological origins and functional properties 5, 6

By understanding the anatomical and functional differences between the RV apex and conus, clinicians can better tailor diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to improve outcomes in patients with RV pathologies.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Right Ventricular Cardiac Syndrome (RVCS) Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Regional right ventricular wall motion in tetralogy of fallot: a three dimensional analysis.

The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2013

Research

Normally and abnormally related great arteries: what have we learned?

World journal for pediatric & congenital heart surgery, 2010

Research

Imaging and modern assessment of the right ventricle.

Minerva cardioangiologica, 2011

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.