What is the percentage of myeloblasts (white blood cell precursors) in the differential count of a bone marrow sample with 65% erythroid (red blood cell) precursors, 14% myeloblasts, and 21% other white blood cells?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 24, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Calculating Myeloblast Percentage in Bone Marrow with High Erythroid Component

When erythroid precursors constitute ≥50% of bone marrow nucleated cells, the correct myeloblast percentage should be calculated from the non-erythroid cells, resulting in 40% myeloblasts in this case.

Calculation Method for Myeloblasts in Erythroid-Predominant Marrow

The bone marrow sample shows:

  • Erythroid nuclear precursors (E) = 65%
  • Myeloblasts = 14%
  • Other white cells = 21%

Step-by-Step Calculation:

  1. Determine if this is an erythroid-predominant marrow

    • Erythroid precursors = 65% (≥50%, so this is erythroid-predominant)
  2. For erythroid-predominant marrow (≥50% erythroid cells):

    • Calculate non-erythroid cells (NEC): 100% - 65% = 35%
    • Non-erythroid cells consist of: myeloblasts (14%) + other white cells (21%)
    • Calculate myeloblast percentage among non-erythroid cells: (14% ÷ 35%) × 100 = 40%

Evidence-Based Rationale

According to WHO classification guidelines, when erythroid precursors constitute ≥50% of bone marrow cells, myeloblasts should be enumerated as a percentage of non-erythroid cells rather than total nucleated cells 1.

This approach is critical because:

  • The 2008 WHO classification specifically states that "when erythroid precursors constitute ≥50% of bone marrow nucleated cells... the percentage of blasts should be based on the non-erythroid cells" 1.

  • The International Working Group on MDS response criteria confirms that "when erythroid precursors constitute less than 50% of bone marrow nucleated cells, the percentage of blasts is based on all nucleated cells; when there are 50% or more erythroid cells, the percentage blasts should be based on the non-erythroid cells" 1.

Clinical Significance

This calculation method has significant prognostic implications:

  • Studies have shown that calculating blasts from non-erythroid cells in erythroid-predominant marrow provides superior risk stratification and prognostic assessment 2, 3.

  • Enumerating blasts from non-erythroid cells can reclassify patients into higher-risk categories, which better reflects their actual prognosis and may alter treatment decisions 2.

  • A study by Wang et al. demonstrated that patients with <5% blasts of non-erythroid cells had significantly better survival than those with ≥5% blasts, a distinction lost when calculating from total nucleated cells 3.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Incorrectly calculating blast percentage from total nucleated cells in erythroid-predominant marrow can lead to underestimation of disease severity and inappropriate treatment decisions.

  • Failing to recognize erythroid hyperplasia (≥50% erythroid precursors) as a trigger to change the calculation method.

  • Not accounting for the dilutional effect of peripheral blood when performing bone marrow differential counts 4.

Therefore, the correct answer is D. 40%.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Considering Bone Marrow Blasts From Nonerythroid Cellularity Improves the Prognostic Evaluation of Myelodysplastic Syndromes.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2016

Research

Erythroid-predominant myelodysplastic syndromes: enumeration of blasts from nonerythroid rather than total marrow cells provides superior risk stratification.

Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2008

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.