HD21 Trial: BrECADD vs eBEACOPP in Advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma
The HD21 trial demonstrated that BrECADD (brentuximab vedotin, etoposide, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, dacarbazine, and dexamethasone) is superior to eBEACOPP (escalated BEACOPP) for advanced-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma, with significantly better tolerability and improved progression-free survival. 1
Trial Design and Patient Population
The HD21 trial was a randomized, multicentre, phase 3 trial conducted by the German Hodgkin Study Group that enrolled patients with:
- Advanced-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma (Ann Arbor stage III/IV)
- Stage II with B symptoms and either large mediastinal mass or extranodal lesions
- Age ≤60 years
Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either:
- BrECADD regimen: Brentuximab vedotin 1.8 mg/kg (day 1), etoposide, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, dacarbazine, and dexamethasone
- eBEACOPP regimen: Escalated doses of bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone
BrECADD Regimen Details
| Drug | Dose | Administration | Days |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brentuximab vedotin | 1.8 mg/kg | IV | Day 1 |
| Etoposide | 150 mg/m² | IV | Days 2-4 |
| Cyclophosphamide | 1250 mg/m² | IV | Day 2 |
| Doxorubicin | 40 mg/m² | IV | Day 2 |
| Dacarbazine | 250 mg/m² | IV | Days 3-4 |
| Dexamethasone | 40 mg | PO | Days 2-5 |
eBEACOPP Regimen Details
| Drug | Dose | Administration | Days |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bleomycin | 10 mg/m² | IV | Day 8 |
| Etoposide | 200 mg/m² | IV | Days 1-3 |
| Doxorubicin | 35 mg/m² | IV | Day 1 |
| Cyclophosphamide | 1250 mg/m² | IV | Day 1 |
| Vincristine | 1.4 mg/m² (max 2 mg) | IV | Day 8 |
| Procarbazine | 100 mg/m² | PO | Days 1-7 |
| Prednisone | 40 mg/m² | PO | Days 1-14 |
| G-CSF | - | SC | From day 8 |
Key Results
The HD21 trial demonstrated several important findings:
- Treatment-related morbidity: Significantly lower with BrECADD (42%) compared to eBEACOPP (59%) 1
- Progression-free survival: Superior with BrECADD (94.3% at 4 years) versus eBEACOPP (90.9% at 4 years) 1
- Overall survival: Similar between groups (98.6% for BrECADD vs 98.2% for eBEACOPP at 4 years) 1
PET-Guided Approach
The HD21 trial incorporated PET assessment after two cycles of therapy to guide treatment decisions:
- Treatment was guided by PET after two cycles
- This approach allows for response-adapted therapy, potentially reducing toxicity while maintaining efficacy
Clinical Implications
The HD21 trial results represent a significant advancement in the treatment of advanced Hodgkin lymphoma:
- BrECADD offers improved tolerability with better efficacy compared to the previous standard eBEACOPP
- The regimen incorporates targeted therapy (brentuximab vedotin) with conventional chemotherapy
- The PET-guided approach allows for personalized treatment decisions
Toxicity Profile
BrECADD demonstrated a more favorable toxicity profile compared to eBEACOPP:
- Lower rates of severe hematologic toxicities
- Reduced risk of infertility
- Lower incidence of infections
- Peripheral neuropathy remains a concern with brentuximab vedotin but is generally manageable
Conclusion
The HD21 trial establishes BrECADD as the new standard of care for advanced-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma, offering improved tolerability and efficacy compared to eBEACOPP. This regimen represents an important evolution in treatment by incorporating targeted therapy with conventional chemotherapy in a PET-guided approach.