Prenatal Diagnostic and Screening Techniques: Amniocentesis, Chorionic Villus Sampling, and Cell-free Fetal DNA
Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening has the highest detection rate for trisomy 21 (99%) compared to other screening methods, but diagnostic confirmation with amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling is essential for definitive results. 1
Amniocentesis
Amniocentesis is a diagnostic procedure typically performed at 15-18 weeks gestation that involves extracting amniotic fluid containing fetal cells for genetic analysis.
Key Characteristics:
- Timing: Usually performed at 15-18 weeks gestation (mid-trimester)
- Detection Rate: >99% for all aneuploidies 1
- Procedure-related Miscarriage Risk: 0.2% (1/500) 1
- Technique: Ultrasound-guided needle insertion through maternal abdomen into amniotic sac to withdraw fluid
- Sample Analysis: Amniotic fluid contains fetal cells that can be cultured for karyotyping and genetic testing
Clinical Considerations:
- Gold standard for definitive prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities
- Allows for AFP testing for neural tube defects (not possible with CVS) 1
- Results typically available 2-3 weeks after procedure
- Early amniocentesis (<15 weeks) is not recommended due to:
Chorionic Villus Sampling (CVS)
CVS is a first-trimester diagnostic procedure that involves sampling placental tissue for genetic analysis.
Key Characteristics:
- Timing: Typically performed at 10-13 weeks gestation
- Detection Rate: >99% for all aneuploidies 1
- Procedure-related Miscarriage Risk: 1% (1/100) 1
- Technique: Two approaches:
- Transcervical: Through cervix using a catheter
- Transabdominal: Through abdominal wall using a needle
- Sample Analysis: Direct analysis of placental tissue (chorionic villi) for chromosomal and genetic disorders
Clinical Considerations:
- Primary advantage is earlier diagnosis compared to amniocentesis
- Particularly useful for DNA-based diagnoses of single-gene disorders (e.g., cystic fibrosis, hemophilia) 1
- Cannot detect neural tube defects (requires maternal serum AFP or ultrasound) 1
- Risk of confined placental mosaicism (1% of cases) where genetic makeup of placenta differs from fetus 1
- Transcervical approach may be more technically challenging than transabdominal (higher failure rate to obtain sample: 2.0% vs 1.1%) 2
Cell-free Fetal DNA (cfDNA) Testing
cfDNA testing is a non-invasive screening method that analyzes placental DNA fragments in maternal blood.
Key Characteristics:
- Timing: Can be performed as early as 10 weeks gestation
- Detection Rate: 99% for trisomy 21, but lower for other aneuploidies 1
- Screen Positive Rate: 1-9% (includes failed tests and false positives) 1
- Technique: Maternal blood draw with analysis of cell-free DNA fragments using next-generation sequencing
- Sample Analysis: Several approaches:
- Massively parallel shotgun sequencing
- Targeted sequencing of specific chromosomal regions
- Analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms 1
Clinical Considerations:
- Non-invasive approach with no procedure-related pregnancy loss
- Primarily screens for trisomies 21,18,13, and sex chromosome abnormalities 1
- Positive predictive value varies based on maternal age and baseline risk (45% in low-risk to 96% in high-risk patients) 1
- Not diagnostic - abnormal results require confirmation with CVS or amniocentesis 1
- Detection rate for all chromosomal abnormalities is approximately 72% (compared to 82% for sequential/integrated screening) 1
- Some laboratories offer expanded panels including microdeletion syndromes, but with limited validation 1
Comparison of Methods
| Test | Detection Rate for T21 | Detection Rate for All Aneuploidies | Procedure-related Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| First-trimester screening | 80% | 69% | None |
| Sequential/integrated screening | 93% | 82% | None |
| cfDNA screening | 99% | 72% | None |
| CVS | >99% | >99% | 1% |
| Amniocentesis | >99% | >99% | 0.2% |
Clinical Algorithm for Prenatal Testing
All pregnant women should be offered options for prenatal screening or diagnostic testing regardless of age 1
First-line screening options:
- Traditional screening (first-trimester, sequential, or integrated)
- cfDNA screening
- Diagnostic testing (CVS or amniocentesis)
- No testing
For women choosing screening:
- cfDNA screening: Highest detection rate for trisomy 21 but misses some other chromosomal abnormalities
- Sequential/integrated screening: Better detection of broader range of chromosomal abnormalities
For abnormal screening results:
- Diagnostic testing with CVS (if <14 weeks) or amniocentesis (if ≥15 weeks) is recommended
- Never terminate pregnancy based on screening results alone without diagnostic confirmation 4
For women desiring diagnostic testing:
- <14 weeks: CVS is preferred (transabdominal approach if available)
- ≥15 weeks: Amniocentesis is preferred
- Early amniocentesis (<15 weeks) should be avoided
Important Counseling Points
- Screening vs. Diagnostic Testing: Clearly distinguish between screening tests (cfDNA, maternal serum screening) and diagnostic tests (amniocentesis, CVS)
- Detection Limitations: cfDNA primarily detects trisomies 21,18,13, and sex chromosome abnormalities, missing approximately 17% of all chromosomal abnormalities 1
- Procedure Risks: Discuss the small but real risk of pregnancy loss with invasive procedures
- Timing Considerations: Earlier diagnosis with CVS allows for earlier decision-making, which may be psychologically and medically advantageous 1
- Test Failures: cfDNA testing fails to provide results in approximately 1-5% of cases, often requiring repeat testing or invasive procedures
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Terminating pregnancy based on screening results alone without confirmatory diagnostic testing 4
- Performing early amniocentesis (<15 weeks) due to increased risks of pregnancy loss and talipes equinovarus 2
- Failing to offer neural tube defect screening when using CVS or cfDNA, as these tests do not detect neural tube defects 1
- Assuming cfDNA detects all chromosomal abnormalities when it primarily targets common trisomies 1
- Performing concurrent screening tests (e.g., cfDNA plus first-trimester screening), as there are no data supporting this approach 1