What is the management approach for septic shock patients with a tricuspid annular systolic plane excursion (TAPSE) of less than 15 mm, indicating right ventricular dysfunction?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 24, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of Septic Shock with TAPSE < 15 mm

In septic shock patients with a tricuspid annular systolic plane excursion (TAPSE) < 15 mm, aggressive fluid resuscitation should be limited and early vasopressor therapy with norepinephrine should be initiated, followed by consideration of inotropic support if hemodynamic goals are not achieved.

Understanding Right Ventricular Dysfunction in Sepsis

Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction is common in septic shock, occurring in approximately 40-48% of patients 1. A TAPSE < 15 mm indicates significant RV systolic dysfunction, which is associated with a threefold higher 28-day mortality in septic patients 1.

Key Pathophysiological Considerations:

  • RV dysfunction in sepsis may result from:
    • Direct myocardial depression from inflammatory mediators
    • Increased pulmonary vascular resistance
    • Ventricular interdependence affecting both RV and LV function
    • Mechanical ventilation-induced increases in RV afterload

Assessment Approach

  1. Confirm RV dysfunction with comprehensive echocardiography:

    • Verify TAPSE < 15 mm (normal is ≥16 mm) 2
    • Look for additional signs of RV dysfunction:
      • RV dilatation (RV/LV end-diastolic area ratio ≥0.6) 3
      • Reduced RV fractional area change (FAC < 35%) 1
      • Flattened interventricular septum (D-shaped LV) 2
  2. Assess for contributing factors:

    • Evaluate for pulmonary embolism (especially with McConnell's sign) 2
    • Check ventilator settings (high PEEP, high peak airway pressures) 4
    • Assess volume status (CVP, IVC collapsibility)
    • Rule out right ventricular infarction 2

Management Algorithm

Step 1: Initial Resuscitation

  • Administer crystalloid fluids cautiously (target 30 mL/kg within first 3 hours) 5
  • Important caveat: In patients with RV dysfunction and elevated CVP (≥8 mmHg), excessive fluid administration may worsen RV function 3
  • Monitor for signs of fluid overload:
    • Increasing CVP
    • Worsening RV dilatation
    • Further decrease in TAPSE

Step 2: Early Vasopressor Support

  • Initiate norepinephrine as first-line vasopressor to target MAP ≥65 mmHg 5
  • Consider vasopressin as an adjunct if high-dose norepinephrine is required
  • Avoid phenylephrine (may increase pulmonary vascular resistance)

Step 3: Consider Inotropic Support

  • If persistent hypoperfusion despite adequate preload and vasopressor support:
    • Add dobutamine (2-20 μg/kg/min) to improve RV contractility
    • Consider milrinone if pulmonary hypertension is present (reduces pulmonary vascular resistance)

Step 4: Optimize Ventilation Strategy

  • Implement lung-protective ventilation:
    • Lower tidal volumes (6 mL/kg ideal body weight)
    • Limit plateau pressures (<30 cmH2O)
    • Minimize PEEP while maintaining adequate oxygenation
    • Consider prone positioning if severe ARDS is present

Step 5: Ongoing Monitoring

  • Serial echocardiographic assessments to evaluate:
    • Response to therapy (TAPSE, RV size)
    • Volume status
    • Need for adjustment in inotropic/vasopressor support

Special Considerations

Fluid Management Pitfalls

  • Despite significant pulse pressure variation (PPV), patients with RV failure may not respond to fluid challenges 3
  • Traditional TAPSE measurement from apical view may be difficult in critically ill patients; subcostal TAPSE can be a reliable alternative 6

When to Escalate Therapy

  • Consider mechanical circulatory support (e.g., VA-ECMO) in refractory cases with:
    • Persistent shock despite optimal medical therapy
    • Progressive RV failure
    • Severe biventricular failure

Prognosis

RV dysfunction in septic shock is associated with:

  • Higher mortality (31% vs. 16% in patients without RV dysfunction) 1
  • Increased need for renal replacement therapy 4
  • Prolonged mechanical ventilation requirements

Regular reassessment of RV function with echocardiography is essential to guide ongoing management and determine response to therapy.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Right ventricular dysfunction in septic shock.

Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet, 2011

Guideline

Sepsis Management Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.