Third-Generation Cephalosporins in Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections
Third-generation cephalosporins are highly effective against many Gram-negative bacteria, with ceftazidime being the preferred agent for Pseudomonas infections, while ceftriaxone and cefotaxime are better choices for Enterobacteriaceae infections when Pseudomonas is not suspected. 1, 2
Spectrum of Activity
Gram-Negative Coverage
- Enterobacteriaceae: All third-generation cephalosporins have excellent activity against E. coli, Klebsiella, Proteus, and most other Enterobacteriaceae 3, 4
- Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Ceftazidime has superior activity (approximately 4 times more active than ceftriaxone) 5, 2
- Haemophilus influenzae and Neisseria meningitidis: All third-generation cephalosporins have excellent coverage 4
Limitations
- Anaerobic coverage: Poor activity against Bacteroides fragilis group; combination with metronidazole is needed for intra-abdominal infections 5
- Gram-positive coverage: Limited activity compared to first and second-generation cephalosporins 6
- Resistance concerns: Third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (3GCephRE) are increasing 1
Clinical Applications
Respiratory Tract Infections
- Community-acquired pneumonia: Ceftriaxone preferred due to better Streptococcus pneumoniae coverage 4, 5
- Hospital-acquired pneumonia: Ceftazidime when Pseudomonas is suspected 5, 2
Urinary Tract Infections
- Uncomplicated: Any third-generation cephalosporin effective 4
- Complicated:
Bloodstream Infections
- Severe infections/sepsis due to 3GCephRE: Carbapenems (imipenem or meropenem) recommended as targeted therapy 1
- BSI without septic shock due to 3GCephRE: Ertapenem may be used 1
Meningitis
- All third-generation cephalosporins penetrate cerebrospinal fluid well 3, 4
- Ceftriaxone and cefotaxime are preferred for bacterial meningitis 4, 7
Endocarditis
- For Gram-negative bacillary endocarditis:
Resistance Management
Third-Generation Cephalosporin-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae (3GCephRE)
- For severe infections: Carbapenems are recommended over continued use of third-generation cephalosporins 1
- For non-severe infections: Consider piperacillin-tazobactam, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, or quinolones 1
- Cephamycins (e.g., cefoxitin) and cefepime should not be used for 3GCephRE infections 1
Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE)
- Newer agents like ceftazidime-avibactam or meropenem-vaborbactam are preferred 1
- For metallo-β-lactamase producers: Consider cefiderocol 1
Practical Considerations
Dosing Advantages
- Ceftriaxone: Once-daily dosing due to longer half-life (approximately 8 hours) 4, 8
- Cefotaxime and ceftazidime: Typically dosed multiple times daily 3, 2
Special Populations
- Diabetic foot infections: Third-generation cephalosporins may be used for moderate to severe infections, particularly when Gram-negative pathogens are suspected 1
Pitfalls and Caveats
- Third-generation cephalosporins should not be used as monotherapy for infections where anaerobes are suspected; combination with metronidazole is necessary 5
- Prolonged use can select for resistant organisms, including extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producers 5
- For 3GCephRE infections, carbapenems are superior to continued third-generation cephalosporin therapy 1
- Ceftazidime should be reserved for infections where Pseudomonas aeruginosa is suspected or confirmed to minimize resistance development 5, 2
When selecting a third-generation cephalosporin, consider the likely pathogens, local resistance patterns, and specific advantages of each agent to optimize patient outcomes and minimize resistance development.