When should a patient be switched from Eliquis (apixaban) to Xarelto (rivaroxaban) due to intolerance?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 25, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Switching from Eliquis (Apixaban) to Xarelto (Rivaroxaban) Due to Intolerance

A patient should be switched from Eliquis to Xarelto when experiencing specific intolerance issues such as gastrointestinal side effects, unexplained bleeding complications despite appropriate dosing, or difficulty with twice-daily dosing adherence.

Indicators of Apixaban Intolerance

Clinical Signs of Intolerance

  • Bleeding complications despite appropriate dosing adjustments
  • Gastrointestinal symptoms (nausea, dyspepsia, abdominal pain) that persist despite mitigation strategies
  • Skin reactions or hypersensitivity manifestations
  • Adherence challenges with twice-daily dosing regimen of apixaban

Specific Scenarios Warranting Switch

  1. Dosing Adherence Issues

    • Patients struggling with twice-daily dosing of apixaban may benefit from rivaroxaban's once-daily regimen 1
    • Particularly relevant for patients with cognitive impairment or complex medication schedules
  2. Gastrointestinal Tolerance

    • Persistent GI symptoms with apixaban despite taking with food
    • Note: If switching due to GI symptoms, monitor closely as rivaroxaban has higher rates of GI bleeding (21.9 vs 12.9 per 1000 person-years) 2
  3. Medication Interactions

    • Different drug interaction profiles between the medications may favor switching
    • Rivaroxaban has different CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein interaction patterns 1
  4. Absorption Considerations

    • Apixaban can be taken without regard to food
    • Rivaroxaban requires food for optimal absorption 1
    • Patients with altered GI anatomy might tolerate one agent better than the other

Clinical Decision Algorithm

  1. Confirm true intolerance rather than improper use or dosing:

    • Verify patient is taking correct dose based on age, weight, and renal function
    • Rule out other causes of symptoms or bleeding (concurrent medications, underlying conditions)
  2. Assess specific intolerance pattern:

    • Bleeding complications: Location, severity, relationship to dosing
    • GI symptoms: Timing relative to medication, severity, impact on quality of life
    • Adherence issues: Missed doses, confusion about regimen
  3. Consider comparative safety profiles:

    • Apixaban has lower rates of major bleeding compared to rivaroxaban (HR 0.58,95% CI 0.52-0.66) 2
    • Rivaroxaban has higher rates of nonfatal extracranial bleeding (39.7 vs 18.5 per 1000 person-years) 3
    • Apixaban demonstrates lower risk of both ischemic events and hemorrhagic events 2
  4. Evaluate patient-specific factors:

    • Renal function: Both medications require dose adjustments for impaired renal function
    • Age and fall risk: Consider the higher bleeding risk with rivaroxaban
    • Concomitant medications: Check for potential interactions with either agent

Switching Process

  1. Timing of switch:

    • For patients with normal renal function, discontinue apixaban and start rivaroxaban at the time of next scheduled apixaban dose
    • No overlap period is required due to rapid onset of action of both medications
  2. Dosing considerations:

    • Standard rivaroxaban dose for atrial fibrillation: 20 mg once daily with food
    • Reduced dose (15 mg once daily) for CrCl 15-50 mL/min 4
  3. Monitoring after switch:

    • Assess for resolution of previous intolerance symptoms
    • Monitor for new side effects or bleeding complications
    • Check renal function periodically

Important Caveats

  • Comparative effectiveness: Recent studies show apixaban may be more effective than rivaroxaban for stroke prevention (6.6 vs 8.0 events per 1000 person-years) with lower bleeding risk 2
  • No specific antidote for rivaroxaban is widely available (similar to apixaban)
  • Food requirement: Unlike apixaban, rivaroxaban must be taken with food for optimal absorption 1
  • Once-daily dosing of rivaroxaban means missing a dose results in longer periods without anticoagulation coverage

Contraindications to Switching

  • Mechanical heart valves or significant mitral stenosis: Neither apixaban nor rivaroxaban is appropriate 1
  • Severe renal impairment (CrCl <15 mL/min): Both medications are contraindicated 4
  • Active major bleeding: Resolve bleeding before initiating any anticoagulant
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding: DOACs are not recommended 4

Remember that while switching between DOACs is sometimes necessary due to intolerance, apixaban generally demonstrates a more favorable safety profile with lower rates of major bleeding and better effectiveness in stroke prevention compared to rivaroxaban based on recent comparative studies 3, 2.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.