Switching from Eliquis (Apixaban) to Xarelto (Rivaroxaban) Due to Intolerance
A patient should be switched from Eliquis to Xarelto when experiencing specific intolerance issues such as gastrointestinal side effects, unexplained bleeding complications despite appropriate dosing, or difficulty with twice-daily dosing adherence.
Indicators of Apixaban Intolerance
Clinical Signs of Intolerance
- Bleeding complications despite appropriate dosing adjustments
- Gastrointestinal symptoms (nausea, dyspepsia, abdominal pain) that persist despite mitigation strategies
- Skin reactions or hypersensitivity manifestations
- Adherence challenges with twice-daily dosing regimen of apixaban
Specific Scenarios Warranting Switch
Dosing Adherence Issues
- Patients struggling with twice-daily dosing of apixaban may benefit from rivaroxaban's once-daily regimen 1
- Particularly relevant for patients with cognitive impairment or complex medication schedules
Gastrointestinal Tolerance
- Persistent GI symptoms with apixaban despite taking with food
- Note: If switching due to GI symptoms, monitor closely as rivaroxaban has higher rates of GI bleeding (21.9 vs 12.9 per 1000 person-years) 2
Medication Interactions
- Different drug interaction profiles between the medications may favor switching
- Rivaroxaban has different CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein interaction patterns 1
Absorption Considerations
- Apixaban can be taken without regard to food
- Rivaroxaban requires food for optimal absorption 1
- Patients with altered GI anatomy might tolerate one agent better than the other
Clinical Decision Algorithm
Confirm true intolerance rather than improper use or dosing:
- Verify patient is taking correct dose based on age, weight, and renal function
- Rule out other causes of symptoms or bleeding (concurrent medications, underlying conditions)
Assess specific intolerance pattern:
- Bleeding complications: Location, severity, relationship to dosing
- GI symptoms: Timing relative to medication, severity, impact on quality of life
- Adherence issues: Missed doses, confusion about regimen
Consider comparative safety profiles:
Evaluate patient-specific factors:
- Renal function: Both medications require dose adjustments for impaired renal function
- Age and fall risk: Consider the higher bleeding risk with rivaroxaban
- Concomitant medications: Check for potential interactions with either agent
Switching Process
Timing of switch:
- For patients with normal renal function, discontinue apixaban and start rivaroxaban at the time of next scheduled apixaban dose
- No overlap period is required due to rapid onset of action of both medications
Dosing considerations:
- Standard rivaroxaban dose for atrial fibrillation: 20 mg once daily with food
- Reduced dose (15 mg once daily) for CrCl 15-50 mL/min 4
Monitoring after switch:
- Assess for resolution of previous intolerance symptoms
- Monitor for new side effects or bleeding complications
- Check renal function periodically
Important Caveats
- Comparative effectiveness: Recent studies show apixaban may be more effective than rivaroxaban for stroke prevention (6.6 vs 8.0 events per 1000 person-years) with lower bleeding risk 2
- No specific antidote for rivaroxaban is widely available (similar to apixaban)
- Food requirement: Unlike apixaban, rivaroxaban must be taken with food for optimal absorption 1
- Once-daily dosing of rivaroxaban means missing a dose results in longer periods without anticoagulation coverage
Contraindications to Switching
- Mechanical heart valves or significant mitral stenosis: Neither apixaban nor rivaroxaban is appropriate 1
- Severe renal impairment (CrCl <15 mL/min): Both medications are contraindicated 4
- Active major bleeding: Resolve bleeding before initiating any anticoagulant
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding: DOACs are not recommended 4
Remember that while switching between DOACs is sometimes necessary due to intolerance, apixaban generally demonstrates a more favorable safety profile with lower rates of major bleeding and better effectiveness in stroke prevention compared to rivaroxaban based on recent comparative studies 3, 2.