What are the most notable trials and treatment regimens for ANCA (Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody)-associated vasculitis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 25, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Notable Trials and Treatment Regimens for ANCA-Associated Vasculitis

Glucocorticoids in combination with rituximab or cyclophosphamide are the cornerstone of initial treatment for ANCA-associated vasculitis, with rituximab being superior for relapsing disease, particularly in PR3-ANCA positive patients. 1

Key Induction Therapy Trials

RAVE Trial (Rituximab vs. Cyclophosphamide)

  • Multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial comparing rituximab (375 mg/m² weekly for 4 weeks) to oral cyclophosphamide (2 mg/kg/day) 2
  • Demonstrated rituximab was non-inferior to cyclophosphamide for remission induction
  • Key finding: Rituximab was superior for relapsing disease with 67% achieving remission vs. 42% in the cyclophosphamide group (p=0.01) 1, 2
  • Post-hoc analysis showed superior remission rates with rituximab in PR3-ANCA subgroup (OR 2.11; 95% CI: 1.04-4.30) 1

RITUXVAS Trial

  • Compared rituximab plus two cyclophosphamide pulses to standard cyclophosphamide regimen in patients with renal involvement 3
  • Similar sustained remission rates: 76% in rituximab group vs. 82% in control group
  • Similar adverse event profiles between groups 3

CYCLOPS Trial

  • Compared oral vs. intravenous cyclophosphamide administration 1
  • IV cyclophosphamide resulted in lower total cyclophosphamide exposure
  • Lower rate of leukopenia with IV regimen
  • However, more relapses occurred with IV cyclophosphamide during long-term follow-up 1

LoVAS Trial

  • Compared reduced-dose prednisolone (0.5 mg/kg/day) vs. high-dose prednisolone (1 mg/kg/day) with rituximab 4
  • Reduced-dose glucocorticoids were non-inferior in achieving remission
  • Significantly fewer serious adverse events (18.8% vs. 36.9%) and serious infections (7.2% vs. 20.0%) in the reduced-dose group 1, 4

MYCYC Trial

  • Compared mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to cyclophosphamide for induction 1
  • Similar remission rates for both PR3-ANCA and MPO-ANCA patients
  • However, much higher relapse risk with MMF in PR3-ANCA patients 1

Maintenance Therapy Trials

MAINRITSAN Trial

  • Evaluated rituximab for maintenance therapy
  • Rituximab dosing: 500 mg × 2 at complete remission, and 500 mg at months 6,12, and 18 1

RITAZAREM Trial

  • Studied rituximab in relapsing GPA/MPA with high remission rates (>90% by 4 months)
  • Rituximab dosing: 1000 mg infusion after remission induction, and at months 4,8,12, and 16 1

Novel Therapeutic Approaches

ADVOCATE Trial

  • Evaluated avacopan (C5a receptor antagonist) as a glucocorticoid-sparing agent
  • Avacopan (30 mg twice daily) was non-inferior to prednisolone for remission induction
  • Post-hoc analysis showed earlier reduction in albuminuria and improved kidney function with avacopan, especially in patients with eGFR <20 ml/min/1.73m² 1

Treatment Algorithm Based on Disease Presentation

  1. For new-onset disease:

    • First-line: Glucocorticoids + rituximab or cyclophosphamide 1
    • Consider rituximab for PR3-ANCA positive patients (superior outcomes) 1
    • Consider cyclophosphamide for severe kidney disease (SCr >4 mg/dl) due to limited data for rituximab in this setting 1
  2. For relapsing disease:

    • Rituximab is preferred (superior outcomes, especially in PR3-ANCA positive patients) 1
    • Rituximab achieves remission in 64-72% of patients with relapsing/refractory disease 5, 6
  3. For maintenance therapy:

    • Options include rituximab, azathioprine, or MMF 1
    • Rituximab preferred for PR3-ANCA positive patients and those with relapsing disease 1
    • Azathioprine (1.5-2 mg/kg/day) is an alternative, especially with low baseline IgG 1

Glucocorticoid Regimens

  • Traditional high-dose: Prednisolone/prednisone 1 mg/kg/day (max 60-80 mg/day) 1, 7
  • Reduced-dose option: Prednisolone 0.5 mg/kg/day with rituximab (non-inferior efficacy with fewer adverse events) 1, 4
  • PEXIVAS trial demonstrated that more rapid glucocorticoid tapering was as effective but safer in patients with GFR <50 ml/min/1.73m² 1

Treatment of Refractory Disease

  • Options include:
    • Increasing glucocorticoids (IV or oral)
    • Adding rituximab if cyclophosphamide was used initially, or vice versa
    • Consider plasma exchange, especially for diffuse alveolar hemorrhage with hypoxemia 1

Monitoring for Disease Activity and Relapse

  • ANCA positivity, increasing ANCA levels, or conversion from negative to positive may predict relapse 1
  • Return of hematuria after initial resolution may indicate kidney relapse 1
  • Regular monitoring of inflammatory markers (e.g., CRP) and kidney function is essential 1

The treatment landscape for ANCA-associated vasculitis has evolved significantly with these landmark trials, moving from cyclophosphamide-based regimens toward more targeted therapies like rituximab, with improved safety profiles and comparable or superior efficacy.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.

The New England journal of medicine, 2010

Research

Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide in ANCA-associated renal vasculitis.

The New England journal of medicine, 2010

Research

Rituximab in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis.

Current rheumatology reports, 2017

Guideline

Vasculitis of the Central Nervous System

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.