Is a PaO2 (partial pressure of arterial oxygen) goal of 55-80 mmHg adequate for patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 25, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

PaO2 Goal of 55-80 mmHg in ARDS Management

A PaO2 goal of 55-80 mmHg is appropriate for most ARDS patients, but targeting the higher end of this range (70-90 mmHg) may be safer based on the most recent evidence. The most recent guidelines from the American Thoracic Society recommend maintaining PaO2 between 70-90 mmHg or SaO2 between 92-97% to balance the risks of hypoxemia and hyperoxia 1.

Evidence for Oxygenation Targets in ARDS

Current Recommendations

  • The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute ARDS Clinical Trials Network has historically recommended a target PaO2 between 55-80 mmHg 2
  • More recent guidelines from the American Thoracic Society recommend slightly higher targets of 70-90 mmHg or SaO2 92-97% 1
  • These targets aim to balance the risks of hypoxemia against the potential harms of hyperoxia

Safety Considerations

The LOCO2 trial (2020) compared conservative oxygen therapy (PaO2 55-70 mmHg) with liberal oxygen therapy (PaO2 90-105 mmHg) and was stopped early due to safety concerns 2:

  • At 90 days, mortality was higher in the conservative-oxygen group (44.4% vs 30.4%)
  • Five mesenteric ischemic events occurred in the conservative-oxygen group
  • This suggests that targeting the very low end of the 55-80 mmHg range may increase risk

ARDS Severity-Based Approach

Oxygen targets should be considered in the context of ARDS severity:

Severity PaO2/FiO2 Recommended Management
Mild 201-300 mmHg • Target PaO2 70-90 mmHg
• Lower PEEP (5-10 cmH2O)
Moderate 101-200 mmHg • Target PaO2 70-90 mmHg
• Higher titrated PEEP
Severe ≤100 mmHg • Target PaO2 70-90 mmHg
• Higher titrated PEEP
• Consider prone positioning
• Consider neuromuscular blockade

Implementation of Oxygenation Strategy

  1. Ventilation Strategy:

    • Use low tidal volume ventilation (6 mL/kg predicted body weight) 3
    • Maintain plateau pressures ≤30 cmH2O 3
    • Adjust PEEP based on ARDS severity 3
  2. For Severe ARDS (PaO2/FiO2 ≤100 mmHg):

    • Implement prone positioning for >12 hours/day 3, 1
    • Consider neuromuscular blockade for ≤48 hours 3, 1
    • Use higher PEEP strategy with careful hemodynamic monitoring 3
  3. For Moderate ARDS (PaO2/FiO2 101-200 mmHg):

    • Consider higher PEEP strategy 3, 1
    • Monitor for need to escalate therapy if oxygenation worsens
  4. For Mild ARDS (PaO2/FiO2 201-300 mmHg):

    • Use low PEEP strategy (defined as <10 cmH2O) 3
    • Consider conservative fluid management 3, 1

Monitoring and Adjustment

  • Regularly assess arterial blood gases to monitor PaO2 levels and calculate PaO2/FiO2 ratio 1
  • Consider standardized ventilatory settings when assessing PaO2/FiO2 ratio for accurate classification 4
  • Monitor for signs of tissue hypoxia (lactate elevation, organ dysfunction) when targeting lower PaO2 values
  • Adjust FiO2 and PEEP to maintain target PaO2, prioritizing FiO2 reduction when possible

Potential Pitfalls

  1. Targeting excessively low PaO2 values:

    • The LOCO2 trial suggests increased mortality with PaO2 55-70 mmHg 2
    • Mesenteric ischemia risk increases with lower oxygenation targets
  2. Excessive PEEP to achieve oxygenation targets:

    • High PEEP can impede venous return and cardiac preload 3
    • Particularly problematic in patients with vasodilated states
  3. Ignoring patient-specific factors:

    • Patients with chronic hypoxemia may tolerate lower PaO2 values
    • Patients with cardiac or cerebrovascular disease may require higher targets

In conclusion, while the historical range of 55-80 mmHg is reasonable, current evidence suggests targeting the higher portion of this range (70-80 mmHg) or slightly above (up to 90 mmHg) may provide a better balance of risks and benefits in ARDS management.

References

Guideline

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.