Treatment Options for Avascular Necrosis (AVN)
The management of avascular necrosis should be based on disease stage, location, and extent of involvement, with early-stage disease benefiting from conservative measures and core decompression, while advanced disease with articular collapse typically requires joint replacement surgery. 1
Diagnosis and Staging
MRI is the gold standard for diagnosis, especially in early stages when X-rays appear normal
Both sides should be imaged when evaluating hip pain, even if symptoms are unilateral
The Ficat and Arlet classification is most commonly used for femoral head AVN:
- Stage I: Normal radiographs, MRI changes only
- Stage II: Sclerotic or cystic lesions without subchondral fracture
- Stage III: Subchondral collapse/crescent sign
- Stage IV: Secondary degenerative joint disease
Necrotic volume assessment is critical:
- ≥30% necrotic volume: 46-83% risk of collapse
- <30% necrotic volume: <5% risk of collapse
Treatment Algorithm Based on Stage
Early-Stage Disease (Pre-collapse: Ficat I-II)
Conservative Management:
- Protected weight-bearing with crutches or walker
- Analgesics: Acetaminophen and NSAIDs (with caution in elderly or those with renal dysfunction)
- Physical therapy once acute pain subsides
- Address modifiable risk factors (corticosteroid use, alcohol consumption)
- Consider bisphosphonates to improve bone density and prevent progression
Surgical Options for Early-Stage Disease:
- Core decompression (first-line surgical intervention)
- Augmentation techniques:
- Autologous bone marrow cell implantation
- Vascularized fibular grafting
- Bone substitute filling
- Electric stimulation
Advanced-Stage Disease (Post-collapse: Ficat III-IV)
Joint Preservation Attempts (limited success):
- Osteotomies (for small, pre-collapse lesions in non-weight-bearing areas)
- Vascularized bone grafting (role still not clearly defined)
Joint Replacement:
- Total joint replacement (main treatment for advanced stages)
- Resurfacing hemiarthroplasty (alternative for femoral or humeral head AVN)
- For talar AVN: talar replacement, arthroplasty, or tibiotalar joint fusion
Site-Specific Management
Hip AVN (Most Common)
- Early stage: Core decompression with or without bone marrow aspirate
- Advanced stage: Total hip replacement (accounts for 10% of all hip replacements in the US)
Knee AVN
- Early stage: Protected weight-bearing, core decompression
- Advanced stage: Unicompartmental or total knee replacement
Shoulder AVN
- Early stage: Conservative management, core decompression
- Advanced stage: Humeral head resurfacing or total shoulder arthroplasty
Talus AVN
- Early stage: Protected weight-bearing, possibly with extracorporeal shock wave therapy 2
- Advanced stage: Hindfoot fusion or total talar replacement 3
Pain Management
- First-line: Regular acetaminophen and NSAIDs (with caution)
- Advanced pain control: Opioids for severe pain (used cautiously with reduced dosing in renal dysfunction)
- Avoid codeine due to side effects including constipation
Special Populations
- HIV-infected patients: Often ultimately require hip replacement; bisphosphonate therapy should be considered if bone densitometry demonstrates osteopenia 1
- Sickle cell disease patients: AVN is a common cause of severe chronic pain with limited treatment options
- Transplant patients: At high risk due to immunosuppressive therapy; may require surgical intervention
Emerging Therapies
- Mesenchymal stem cell therapy shows promise for improving functional prognosis, particularly in early stages 1
- 3D-printed total talar prostheses for talar AVN 3
Treatment Effectiveness
- Core decompression shows statistically higher success rates than conservative treatment for stage I hips only (84% vs 61%) 4
- Success rates for core decompression decrease significantly with advancing stages: 84% for stage I, 63% for stage II, and only 29% for stage III 4
The key to successful management is early diagnosis and intervention before articular collapse occurs, as joint-preserving procedures have much higher success rates in pre-collapse stages.