Difference Between UPEP and SPEP
Serum Protein Electrophoresis (SPEP) analyzes proteins in blood serum, while Urine Protein Electrophoresis (UPEP) examines proteins in urine, with both tests being complementary rather than interchangeable in the evaluation of plasma cell disorders. 1
Key Differences
Sample Source
- SPEP: Uses blood serum collected in a serum-separator tube or red-top tube
- UPEP: Uses a 24-hour urine collection sample
Proteins Detected
- SPEP: Detects serum proteins including albumin, alpha-1, alpha-2, beta, and gamma globulins
- UPEP: Specifically identifies proteins excreted in urine, including Bence-Jones proteins (free light chains)
Clinical Utility
SPEP:
- Primary screening test for monoclonal gammopathies
- Sensitivity of approximately 71% for detecting plasma cell disorders 2
- Can detect serum M-proteins but may miss light chain disease
- Provides information about overall protein distribution patterns
UPEP:
Clinical Applications
Multiple Myeloma Diagnosis
- According to NCCN guidelines, both tests are recommended as part of the initial diagnostic workup for suspected plasma cell disorders 1
- In a Mayo Clinic review of 1,027 newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients:
- 20% had secretory urinary proteins (detectable by UPEP)
- 3% had neither serum nor urine proteins (nonsecretory myeloma) 1
Complementary Nature
- UPEP and SPEP supplement each other in characterizing proteinuria 3
- UPEP can provide distinctive patterns indicating the source of proteinuria in renal diseases independent of gammopathies
- Combined use of UPEP and SPEP with their respective immunofixation tests (UIFE and SIFE) provides the most comprehensive evaluation
Testing Protocol
- For complete evaluation of plasma cell disorders, the following tests should be ordered together:
- SPEP with serum immunofixation electrophoresis (SIFE)
- UPEP with urine immunofixation electrophoresis (UIFE)
- Serum free light chain (FLC) assay 4
Important Considerations
Monitoring Disease
- Once an M-protein is quantified, the same test must be used for serial studies to ensure accurate relative quantification 1
- UPEP remains essential for monitoring patients with measurable urinary M-proteins, as the serum FLC assay cannot replace it 1
Common Pitfalls
- Failing to perform urine studies can lead to missed diagnoses
- Relying solely on SPEP without UPEP may miss light chain disease
- Not using consistent testing methods for serial monitoring can lead to inaccurate assessment of disease progression or response to treatment
By understanding the differences and complementary nature of SPEP and UPEP, clinicians can appropriately utilize these tests to diagnose and monitor plasma cell disorders effectively.