What is the recommended approach to assess the risk of self-harm cutting in an individual?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 26, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Comprehensive Assessment of Self-Harm Cutting Risk

All individuals over 10 years of age with mental health conditions, chronic pain, or acute emotional distress should be systematically assessed for thoughts or plans of self-harm in the last month and acts of self-harm in the last year at initial assessment and periodically thereafter. 1

Key Components of Self-Harm Risk Assessment

1. Direct Questioning About Self-Harm

  • Ask explicitly about:
    • Thoughts or plans of self-harm in the past month
    • Acts of self-harm in the past year
    • Frequency and severity of cutting behaviors
    • Location of cuts (concealed vs. visible) - concealed cuts are associated with higher risk of repetition 2
    • Methods used (severity of cutting, multiple methods)

2. Assess Specific Risk Factors

  • Previous self-harm history - one of the strongest predictors of future self-harm 3
  • Mental health conditions, particularly:
    • Depression
    • Anxiety disorders
    • Substance use disorders
    • Eating disorders (particularly bulimia symptoms, which are significant predictors of near-fatal self-harm) 4
  • Impulsivity assessment - both behavioral and cognitive aspects 1
  • Recent traumatic events or interpersonal conflicts
  • Social support availability
  • Access to means for self-harm (e.g., sharp objects)

3. Evaluate Characteristics of Self-Cutting

  • Method specifics - minor vs. severe cutting (severity increases risk) 3
  • Location of cuts - concealed cuts are associated with:
    • Previous self-harm
    • Current psychiatric treatment
    • Premeditation
    • Greater risk of repetition 2
  • Frequency - increased frequency indicates higher risk

4. Assess Psychological State

  • Suicidal intent - distinguish between non-suicidal self-injury and suicidal behavior
  • Emotional distress levels
  • Coping mechanisms
  • Problem-solving abilities
  • Dissociative symptoms

Comprehensive Assessment Tools

  • Structured psychosocial assessment - recommended for all individuals presenting with self-harm 1
  • Validated screening tools when appropriate:
    • Bulimia Investigatory Test, Edinburgh (BITE) - particularly useful for predicting near-fatal self-harm in females who cut 4
    • Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) - to assess alcohol misuse
    • Impulsivity measures (e.g., Barratt Impulsiveness Scale)

Risk Management Following Assessment

  1. Restrict access to means for self-harm as long as the individual has thoughts, plans, or acts of self-harm 1
  2. Establish regular contact (telephone, home visits, letters) for persons with acts of self-harm in the last year 1
  3. Implement structured problem-solving approaches for persons with acts of self-harm in the last year 1
  4. Facilitate social support from available informal and formal community resources 1
  5. Consider appropriate psychosocial interventions based on risk level:
    • Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)
    • Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT)
    • Mentalization-Based Therapy (MBT)
    • Group-based emotion regulation therapy 5

Important Considerations

  • Hospitalization in non-specialized services is not routinely recommended solely to prevent self-harm acts 1
  • If imminent risk exists, urgent referral to mental health services should be considered
  • When specialized services are unavailable, mobilize family, friends, and other available resources for close monitoring 1
  • All young people presenting to hospital following self-harm should receive a psychosocial assessment 2

By systematically addressing these components in the assessment of self-harm cutting risk, clinicians can better identify individuals at higher risk and implement appropriate interventions to reduce morbidity and mortality.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

The significance of site of cut in self-harm in young people.

Journal of affective disorders, 2020

Research

Psychosocial interventions for self-harm in adults.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2021

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.