What screening is necessary for a 48-year-old female with a likely pathogenic variant in the CHEK2 (Checkpoint Kinase 2) gene, specifically the c.190G>A (p.Glu64Lys) mutation?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 27, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Screening Recommendations for a 48-Year-Old Female with CHEK2 c.190G>A Pathogenic Variant

For a 48-year-old female with a likely pathogenic variant in the CHEK2 gene (c.190G>A), enhanced breast cancer screening is the primary recommendation, with colorectal cancer screening according to population guidelines and consideration of family history for other cancer risks. 1, 2

Breast Cancer Screening

Primary Recommendations

  • Annual mammography starting immediately (if not already begun)
  • Annual breast MRI alternating with mammography at 6-month intervals
  • Clinical breast examination every 6-12 months
  • Consider risk-reducing strategies based on comprehensive risk assessment using tools like CanRisk that incorporate:
    • Family history
    • CHEK2 variant type
    • Other risk factors

Risk Context

  • CHEK2 pathogenic variants confer a moderate risk of breast cancer (2-3 fold increased risk compared to general population)
  • The specific c.190G>A variant is likely pathogenic, requiring appropriate surveillance
  • Risk is modified by family history and other factors 1

Colorectal Cancer Screening

  • Standard colonoscopy screening starting at age 45 if no family history of colorectal cancer
  • Enhanced screening (starting at age 40 or 10 years before earliest colorectal cancer diagnosis in a first-degree relative, repeating every 5 years) if:
    • Patient has a truncating CHEK2 variant (c.190G>A may qualify)
    • Family history of colorectal cancer exists 2

Additional Cancer Screening Considerations

For Female Patients

  • No specific ovarian cancer screening is recommended based solely on CHEK2 status
  • Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy is not indicated based on CHEK2 status alone 2

For Family Members

  • Recommend cascade genetic testing for first-degree relatives (siblings, children)
  • Testing is particularly important for female relatives due to breast cancer risk 1

Important Clinical Considerations

Variant-Specific Factors

  • The c.190G>A variant in CHEK2 is considered likely pathogenic
  • CHEK2 pathogenic variants are associated with increased risk of:
    • Breast cancer (primary concern)
    • Colorectal cancer (moderate risk)
    • Possibly prostate cancer in male relatives 2

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  1. Don't underestimate risk based on lack of family history - CHEK2 variants can show variable penetrance and may present without strong family history 1
  2. Don't apply BRCA1/2 management protocols - CHEK2 has different risk profiles and management needs
  3. Don't neglect comprehensive risk assessment - Use tools like CanRisk to personalize screening recommendations 1
  4. Don't overlook the impact of obesity - Research suggests obesity may increase breast cancer risk in CHEK2 carriers 3

Prognosis Considerations

  • CHEK2 pathogenic variants have been associated with adverse prognosis in early-onset breast cancer 3
  • This underscores the importance of vigilant screening to detect cancer at earlier stages

Follow-up Recommendations

  • Annual reassessment of screening protocol
  • Update risk assessment if family history changes
  • Consider referral to high-risk breast clinic for ongoing management

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Cancer Screening for Individuals with CHEK2 Genetic Test

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.