Apixaban Safety in Patients with History of Hemorrhagic Stroke
Apixaban (Eliquis) should generally be avoided in patients with a history of hemorrhagic stroke due to the significantly increased risk of recurrent intracerebral hemorrhage. 1
Risk Assessment for Anticoagulation After Hemorrhagic Stroke
When considering anticoagulation in patients with a history of hemorrhagic stroke, several factors must be carefully evaluated:
Risk Factors for Recurrent Hemorrhage
- Lobar location of initial hemorrhagic stroke
- Older age
- Presence and number of microbleeds on gradient echo MRI
- Ongoing anticoagulation
- Presence of cerebral amyloid angiopathy 1
Timing Considerations
The optimal timing for resumption of anticoagulation after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is uncertain, with no randomized trial data available to guide this decision. However, observational data suggests:
- The risk of rebleeding with early resumption of anticoagulation exceeds the risk of thromboembolism from withholding it
- A survival model found that total risk of ischemic plus hemorrhagic stroke was minimized when anticoagulation was reinitiated after approximately 10 weeks
- A delay of at least 1 month after ICH is suggested 1
Alternative Approaches for Patients with AF and History of Hemorrhagic Stroke
For patients with atrial fibrillation who have had a hemorrhagic stroke but require stroke prevention:
Left atrial appendage closure: Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (Watchman device) might be a safer alternative to warfarin in some patients with atrial fibrillation 1, 2
Antiplatelet therapy: Antiplatelet monotherapy may be a safer alternative to oral anticoagulation in selected patients, though it provides less protection against cardioembolic events 1
Risk-benefit assessment: The decision must weigh the risk of recurrent hemorrhage against the risk of cardioembolic events, particularly in patients with high CHA₂DS₂-VASc scores 1
Apixaban vs. Warfarin in Patients with Bleeding History
While apixaban has a better safety profile than warfarin in terms of intracranial hemorrhage risk:
- Apixaban was associated with lower rates of hemorrhagic stroke compared to warfarin (0.24% vs 0.47% per year) in the ARISTOTLE trial 1, 3
- In patients with a history of bleeding, apixaban still demonstrated fewer outcomes compared to warfarin for stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, death, or major bleeding 4
- However, this data did not specifically focus on patients with prior hemorrhagic stroke
Clinical Decision-Making Algorithm
Assess hemorrhagic stroke characteristics:
- Location (lobar vs. deep)
- Time since hemorrhage (minimum 4-8 weeks)
- Presence of microbleeds on MRI
- Underlying cause (hypertension, amyloid angiopathy, etc.)
Evaluate competing risks:
- CHA₂DS₂-VASc score for stroke risk
- HAS-BLED score for bleeding risk
- Presence of cerebral atherosclerosis (may increase recurrent stroke risk) 5
Consider alternatives to full anticoagulation:
- Left atrial appendage closure if patient can tolerate 45 days of anticoagulation 2
- Antiplatelet therapy if stroke risk is moderate
- No antithrombotic therapy if bleeding risk substantially exceeds stroke risk
Important Caveats and Pitfalls
- The safety of oral anticoagulation in patients with cerebral amyloid angiopathy and in the presence of microbleeds remains unclear 1
- Avoid combining anticoagulants with antiplatelets unless specifically indicated, as this significantly increases bleeding risk 2
- While DOACs (including apixaban) have lower rates of intracranial hemorrhage than warfarin, their safety specifically in patients with prior hemorrhagic stroke has not been well established 1
- The timing of anticoagulation initiation after ischemic stroke varies based on stroke severity, but hemorrhagic stroke presents a much higher risk profile 2
In conclusion, while apixaban has a better safety profile than warfarin regarding intracranial hemorrhage, a history of hemorrhagic stroke remains a significant concern for any anticoagulant therapy. Left atrial appendage closure or careful antiplatelet therapy may be safer alternatives in this high-risk population.