Do Shiga Toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) strains possess the Locus of Enterocyte Effacement (LEE) pathogenicity island?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 27, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Presence of LEE Pathogenicity Island in STEC Strains

Not all Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) strains possess the Locus of Enterocyte Effacement (LEE) pathogenicity island; O157 STEC strains almost universally contain LEE, while many non-O157 STEC strains are LEE-negative. 1, 2

STEC Classification Based on LEE Status

LEE-Positive STEC

  • O157 STEC strains, which are responsible for most STEC outbreaks and severe disease cases, almost universally contain the LEE pathogenicity island 1
  • LEE encodes genes that mediate colonization of the human intestine, including the eae gene 1, 2
  • The presence of both stx2 and eae genes (found in LEE) is associated with increased risk of severe disease, including hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) 1, 3

LEE-Negative STEC

  • An emerging subset of STEC strains lacks the LEE pathogenicity island but can still cause severe disease 2, 4
  • LEE-negative STEC strains have been increasingly associated with human disease in several countries 2
  • These strains utilize alternative adherence mechanisms, including:
    • Locus of Adhesion and Autoaggregation (LAA) - an 86-kb pathogenicity island found exclusively in emerging LEE-negative STEC strains 2, 5
    • LAA contains 80 genes encoding novel and known virulence factors associated with adherence and autoaggregation 2
    • LAA is found in approximately 46% of LEE-negative STEC strains, particularly those belonging to serogroups O91, O174, O113, O171, O178, and O130 5

Clinical and Diagnostic Implications

Virulence Assessment

  • The presence of stx2 and eae (LEE) genes is associated with increased risk of severe disease 1, 3
  • LEE-negative STEC strains harboring LAA have been linked to severe disease, including HUS cases 2, 5
  • The CDC recommends laboratory methods that can detect both LEE-positive and LEE-negative STEC strains 1, 3

Laboratory Detection

  • Simultaneous testing for O157 STEC (typically LEE-positive) and non-O157 STEC (which may be LEE-negative) is recommended 1
  • Detection methods should include:
    • Culture for E. coli O157:H7 using selective media
    • Testing for Shiga toxin production (EIA)
    • PCR for detecting stx1 and stx2 genes 3
  • Future diagnostic methods should ideally assess virulence potential by detecting genes like stx2 and eae 1

Evolutionary Context

  • LEE-positive STEC evolved from enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) 4
  • LEE-negative STEC with LAA represent a more recent evolutionary event 2
  • The acquisition of LAA appears to be a recent evolutionary development contributing to the emergence of virulent LEE-negative STEC strains 2, 5
  • LAA is predominantly found in STEC strains belonging to phylogroup B1 (91%) 5

Important Considerations

  • When assessing STEC virulence potential, testing for both LEE (eae gene) and Shiga toxin genes is crucial 1, 3
  • The presence of LAA in LEE-negative STEC may serve as a marker for potentially virulent strains 2, 5
  • Both LEE-positive and LEE-negative STEC strains can cause severe disease, though the molecular mechanisms differ 2, 4
  • The six most common non-O157 EHEC serogroups in the United States (O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, and O145) may include both LEE-positive and LEE-negative strains 3

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.