What diagnostic testing is recommended for a patient with intermittent non-radiating flank pain, urinary frequency, and tenderness on palpation, with negative pregnancy test and urinalysis, and no fever?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 27, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Diagnostic Testing for Intermittent Non-Radiating Flank Pain with Negative Urinalysis

Non-contrast CT of the abdomen and pelvis is the recommended initial diagnostic test for a patient with intermittent non-radiating flank pain, urinary frequency, and tenderness on palpation, despite negative pregnancy test, urinalysis, and absence of fever. 1, 2

Rationale for Non-contrast CT

  • Gold standard for urolithiasis detection with sensitivity up to 97% 2
  • Can identify alternative diagnoses in approximately one-third of patients with acute flank pain 3
  • Provides detailed information about:
    • Stone size and location (critical for management decisions)
    • Secondary signs of obstruction
    • Periureteral and perinephric inflammation
    • Alternative diagnoses that may mimic urolithiasis symptoms

Alternative Imaging Options

If radiation exposure is a concern or CT is unavailable:

Ultrasound

  • Reasonable alternative with sensitivity up to 100% and specificity up to 90% for diagnosing ureteral obstruction 2
  • Improved sensitivity for small renal stones (up to 99% for stones <5mm) when combined with color Doppler and twinkling artifact assessment 1, 2
  • Less sensitive than CT for direct stone visualization, with overall sensitivity of 24-57% for stone detection 1

Combined Ultrasound and Radiography

  • Combination yields sensitivity of approximately 79% for detecting clinically significant stones 1
  • Provides an acceptable alternative to CT for some patients 1

Important Clinical Considerations

Negative Urinalysis Interpretation

  • Despite the negative urinalysis in this case, urolithiasis remains a possibility
  • Up to 10-15% of patients with confirmed urolithiasis may have a negative urinalysis
  • The absence of hematuria does not exclude stone disease, especially with:
    • Intermittent obstruction
    • Complete obstruction
    • Dehydration

Alternative Diagnoses to Consider

  • Right colonic diverticulitis (accounts for 8% of right lower quadrant pain cases) 2
  • Bowel obstruction (3% of right lower quadrant pain cases) 2
  • Musculoskeletal causes of flank pain
  • Gynecological conditions (despite negative pregnancy test)
  • Renal infarction or other vascular pathologies

Diagnostic Algorithm

  1. First-line imaging: Non-contrast CT abdomen and pelvis
  2. If CT contraindicated or unavailable: Ultrasound of kidneys, ureters, and bladder with color Doppler
  3. If ultrasound is negative but symptoms persist: Consider contrast-enhanced CT or MR urography

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Relying solely on urinalysis to rule out urolithiasis
  • Assuming that absence of fever excludes infection (early or partially treated infections may be afebrile)
  • Overlooking non-urological causes of flank pain
  • Failing to consider contrast-enhanced imaging when non-contrast studies are inconclusive

The American College of Radiology consistently recommends non-contrast CT as the initial imaging modality for acute flank pain with suspected stone disease, even in cases with atypical presentations or negative urinalysis 1.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Imaging Guidelines for Suspected Urolithiasis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.