What is the APACHE (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation) score?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 28, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

APACHE Score: A Comprehensive Severity of Disease Classification System

The APACHE (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation) score is a widely validated severity of disease classification system that evaluates 12 physiologic measurements, age, and chronic health status to predict mortality risk in critically ill patients. 1

Components of APACHE II Score

The APACHE II score consists of three main parts:

  1. Acute Physiological Variables (12 parameters):

    • Temperature
    • Mean arterial pressure
    • Heart rate
    • Respiratory rate
    • Oxygenation (PaO2 or A-a gradient)
    • Arterial pH
    • Serum sodium
    • Serum potassium
    • Serum creatinine
    • Hematocrit
    • White blood cell count
    • Glasgow Coma Scale
  2. Age Points: Points assigned based on patient's age

  3. Chronic Health Status: Points assigned for severe organ system insufficiency or immunocompromised state

The total score ranges from 0 to 71, with higher scores correlating with increased mortality risk 1, 2.

Clinical Utility

  • Mortality Prediction: APACHE II demonstrates high accuracy for predicting mortality with a sensitivity of 83.3% and specificity of 91% 3.

  • Risk Stratification: Helps categorize patients based on severity, with an APACHE-II score ≥8 indicating severe disease in conditions like acute pancreatitis 3.

  • Resource Allocation: Assists in evaluating ICU resource utilization and comparing care efficacy across different hospitals 1.

  • Research Applications: Enables case-mix adjustment in clinical studies to ensure comparable patient populations 2.

Prognostic Value

Recent research confirms the strong correlation between APACHE II scores and mortality:

  • Patients with scores 31-40: 100% mortality
  • Patients with scores 21-30: 100% mortality
  • Patients with scores 11-20: 28.45% mortality
  • Patients with scores 3-10: Lowest mortality 4

Comparison with Other Scoring Systems

While APACHE II remains widely used, other scoring systems include:

  • SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment): Focuses on six organ systems but doesn't include age or chronic health factors 3.

  • SAPS II (Simplified Acute Physiology Score II): Based on 12 physiologic variables, age, admission type, and underlying disease 3.

  • BISAP (Bedside Index for Severity in Acute Pancreatitis): A simpler five-component score specifically for acute pancreatitis that includes BUN, mental status, SIRS, age, and pleural effusion 3, 5.

Limitations and Considerations

  • Timing: APACHE II is typically calculated using the worst values within the first 24 hours of ICU admission 4.

  • Complexity: The score is relatively cumbersome, requiring collection of multiple parameters 3.

  • Disease-Specific Limitations: While applicable across various conditions, disease-specific scores may be more accurate for certain conditions 3, 5.

  • Evolution: The system has evolved through multiple versions, with APACHE IV being the most recent iteration 6.

Clinical Application

The APACHE II score serves as an early warning indicator of mortality risk, prompting clinicians to potentially upgrade treatment protocols for high-risk patients 4. When combined with an accurate description of the underlying disease, it provides valuable prognostic information to guide clinical decision-making and resource allocation.

References

Research

Predicting outcome in critical care: the current status of the APACHE prognostic scoring system.

Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 1991

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Acute Pancreatitis Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

APACHE: an evaluation.

Critical care nursing quarterly, 2009

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.