Testing Recommendations for Individuals with Family History of Blood Clots in Primary Care
Routine thrombophilia testing is not recommended for all individuals with a family history of blood clots in the primary care setting, but targeted testing should be offered to specific high-risk groups.
Who Should Be Tested
Testing for thrombophilia should be considered in the following situations:
- Relatives of individuals with venous thrombosis under age 50 1, 2
- Individuals with a strong family history of thrombotic disease (especially first-degree relatives affected) 1, 2
- Women with family history of blood clots who are:
Testing Panel Recommendations
When testing is indicated, the following comprehensive panel should be ordered:
Genetic tests:
- Factor V Leiden mutation (R506Q)
- Prothrombin G20210A variant
Functional coagulation assays:
- Protein C deficiency
- Protein S deficiency
- Antithrombin III deficiency
- Antiphospholipid antibodies (lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin, anti-β2 glycoprotein I) 2
Important Testing Considerations
Timing of testing: Testing should be performed either before anticoagulation is started or at least 2 weeks after discontinuation of anticoagulation, as therapy can affect functional test results 2
Pre-test counseling: Patients should be informed about:
- Potential implications for family members
- Possible impact on insurance and employment
- How results might affect clinical management 2
Clinical Significance and Risk Assessment
- Family history alone increases VTE risk approximately 2-fold, and up to 4-fold when multiple relatives are affected 3
- Family history remains a significant risk indicator regardless of identified genetic factors 3
- Risk increases substantially with combined risk factors:
- Heterozygous Factor V Leiden: 3-7 fold increased risk
- Homozygous Factor V Leiden: 18 times higher risk
- Multiple thrombophilic factors: up to 20-fold increased risk 2
Pitfalls and Caveats
- Poor correlation: Family history corresponds poorly with known genetic risk factors, suggesting unidentified hereditary components 3
- Limited utility for recurrence prediction: Family history does not reliably predict recurrence risk in those who have already had a VTE event 4
- Potential harms: Consider psychosocial effects and insurance implications of positive results 1
- Cost-effectiveness: Random screening of general population is not recommended 1, 2
Special Considerations
- Testing for thrombophilia in asymptomatic family members requires careful risk-benefit analysis
- For women considering oral contraceptives with positive family history, alternative contraception methods may be considered if testing reveals thrombophilia
- The presence of environmental risk factors (surgery, trauma, malignancy) does not preclude testing when family history is significant 1
By following these evidence-based recommendations, primary care providers can appropriately identify individuals who would benefit from thrombophilia testing while avoiding unnecessary testing in low-risk populations.