Is recalling Lutetium-177 (LU-177) better than extended continuous treatment for prostate cancer?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 28, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Recalling LU-177 vs. Extended Continuous Treatment for Prostate Cancer

Recalling (rechallenge) of LU-177 PSMA therapy shows better efficacy than continuous extended treatment for prostate cancer patients, with significantly higher PSA response rates (90.4% vs 61.9%) and longer overall survival (40.2 vs 23.2 months). 1

Treatment Approaches with LU-177 PSMA Therapy

Standard Treatment Protocol

  • Standard LU-177 PSMA therapy consists of 7.4 GBq (200 mCi) administered intravenously every 6 weeks for 4-6 cycles 2
  • The VISION trial demonstrated significant benefits with LU-177 PSMA-617 plus standard of care compared to standard of care alone:
    • Improved median overall survival: 15.3 vs 11.3 months (HR 0.62, p<0.001)
    • Improved median progression-free survival: 8.7 vs 3.4 months (HR 0.40, p<0.001) 2

Extended Treatment Options

Option 1: Continuous Extended Treatment

  • Involves uninterrupted continuation of therapy beyond 6 cycles
  • Median overall survival from initiation: 23.2 months
  • Initial PSA response rate (≥50% decline): 61.9% 1

Option 2: Rechallenge Treatment (Preferred)

  • Involves reexposure to LU-177 PSMA therapy after a treatment break
  • Median overall survival from initiation: 40.2 months (significantly longer than continuous treatment)
  • Initial PSA response rate (≥50% decline): 90.4% (significantly higher than continuous treatment, p=0.006)
  • PSA decline ≥50% observed in 37.1% of patients after first rechallenge 1

Safety Considerations

  • Extended therapy with LU-177 PSMA (both continuous and rechallenge) shows comparable safety profiles:

    • Grade 3-4 anemia: 16.3% (continuous) vs 19.1% (rechallenge), p=0.6
    • Grade 3-4 leukocytopenia: 2.3% (continuous) vs 3.0% (rechallenge), p=0.3
    • Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia: 7.0% (continuous) vs 4.4% (rechallenge), p=0.3
    • Grade 3-4 renal toxicity: 4.7% (continuous) vs 7.4% (rechallenge), p=0.2 1
  • The VISION trial safety analysis showed that longer exposure to LU-177 PSMA-617 was not associated with higher toxicity risk, supporting the use of up to 6 cycles in patients benefiting from and tolerating this therapy 3

Monitoring Response and Treatment Decisions

  • PSA monitoring should be performed by cycle, with formal response evaluation no earlier than 12 weeks after treatment initiation 2
  • PSMA PET imaging is recommended at baseline, after every 2 cycles (approximately every 12-16 weeks), and at least annually thereafter 2
  • Post-therapy imaging should be performed after each Lu-177 infusion (typically 1-24 hours post-infusion) using SPECT/CT 2

Clinical Implications

  • The rechallenge approach allows for treatment breaks which may:

    • Reduce cumulative toxicity
    • Preserve bone marrow function
    • Potentially resensitize cancer cells to the treatment
    • Improve quality of life during treatment breaks
  • Patients who initially respond well to LU-177 PSMA therapy are particularly good candidates for the rechallenge approach when they show disease progression after the initial treatment course

Pitfalls and Caveats

  • Not all patients will respond to rechallenge therapy (37.1% PSA response rate with rechallenge)
  • Patient selection is crucial - candidates should have:
    • Confirmed metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
    • High PSMA expression on PET imaging
    • No dominant PSMA-negative metastatic lesions 2
  • Regular monitoring of hematological parameters and renal function is essential before each cycle to assess for toxicity 2
  • PSA patterns can vary, including initial rise followed by decline, plateau, or delayed response, which should be considered when evaluating treatment efficacy 2

Based on the most recent evidence, the rechallenge approach with LU-177 PSMA therapy demonstrates superior outcomes compared to continuous extended treatment for prostate cancer patients who have previously responded to this therapy.

References

Research

Safety and Efficacy of Extended Therapy with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA: A German Multicenter Study.

Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2024

Guideline

Management of Metastatic Prostate Cancer

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.