What is the difference in management approach between interarterial (between arteries) shunts and intercardiac (between heart chambers) shunts?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 29, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management Differences Between Interarterial and Intracardiac Shunts

The management of interarterial shunts differs significantly from intracardiac shunts, with intracardiac shunts generally requiring closure when hemodynamically significant, while interarterial shunts may sometimes be therapeutically created in specific clinical scenarios.

Intracardiac Shunts (Between Heart Chambers)

Diagnostic Evaluation

  • Echocardiography is the first-line imaging modality to assess:
    • Location and size of defect
    • Direction of shunting
    • Chamber enlargement
    • Pulmonary artery pressure estimation
  • CMR is indicated for further quantification of ventricular volumes and shunt magnitude 1
  • Cardiac catheterization to determine:
    • Pulmonary-to-systemic flow ratio (Qp:Qs)
    • Pulmonary vascular resistance
    • Pulmonary artery pressures

Management Algorithm

  1. For left-to-right shunts with Qp:Qs ≥1.5:1, chamber enlargement, and PA systolic pressure <50% systemic:

    • Secundum ASD: Transcatheter device closure recommended 1
    • Primum ASD, sinus venosus defect, or coronary sinus defect: Surgical repair recommended 1
    • VSD: Surgical or device closure based on location and anatomy 1
  2. For left-to-right shunts with borderline pulmonary pressures:

    • PA systolic pressure ≥50% systemic or PVR >1/3 but <2/3 systemic: Closure may be considered (Class IIb) 1, 2
    • Requires careful hemodynamic assessment before intervention
  3. Contraindications to closure:

    • PA systolic pressure >2/3 systemic
    • PVR >2/3 systemic
    • Net right-to-left shunt (Eisenmenger syndrome)
    • Exercise-induced desaturation 1

Post-Closure Monitoring

  • Regular follow-up to assess:
    • Residual shunts
    • Chamber size normalization
    • Pulmonary pressure changes
    • Development of arrhythmias

Interarterial Shunts (Between Arteries)

Types and Management

  1. Pathologic interarterial shunts:

    • Patent ductus arteriosus (PDA): Connects aorta to pulmonary artery
    • Management: Transcatheter occlusion for moderate-to-large PDAs with left-to-right shunt causing:
      • Congestive heart failure
      • Pulmonary overcirculation
      • Left atrial/ventricular enlargement 2
    • Same hemodynamic criteria apply as for intracardiac shunts (PA pressure <50% systemic, PVR <1/3 systemic)
  2. Aortopulmonary collaterals:

    • Often develop in cyanotic congenital heart disease
    • Management: Selective embolization if causing volume overload
  3. Therapeutic interarterial shunts:

    • Surgically created shunts (e.g., Blalock-Taussig shunt) for palliation in cyanotic heart disease
    • Management: Maintain patency until definitive repair

Unique Considerations for Interarterial Shunts

  • Higher risk of volume overload to left heart
  • More likely to cause pulmonary hypertension if left untreated
  • May require earlier intervention than intracardiac shunts of similar size

Therapeutic Creation of Shunts

An important distinction is that while most pathologic shunts require closure, there are specific scenarios where creating shunts is therapeutic:

  1. Interatrial shunts: May be deliberately created in:

    • Severe pulmonary hypertension to decompress the right heart 3
    • Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction to reduce left atrial pressure 4, 5
  2. Interarterial shunts: May be surgically created in:

    • Cyanotic congenital heart disease as palliative procedure
    • Pulmonary atresia to provide pulmonary blood flow

Key Differences in Management Approach

  1. Assessment of shunt significance:

    • Both require Qp:Qs calculation, but interarterial shunts typically cause more significant hemodynamic effects at smaller sizes
  2. Timing of intervention:

    • Interarterial shunts often require earlier intervention due to greater hemodynamic impact
    • Intracardiac shunts may be observed longer if hemodynamically insignificant
  3. Closure techniques:

    • Intracardiac: Device closure for secundum ASD, selected VSDs; surgical for other types
    • Interarterial: Primarily device occlusion for PDA; surgical for other types
  4. Post-intervention monitoring:

    • Interarterial shunt closure may lead to more immediate hemodynamic changes
    • Intracardiac shunt closure effects may develop more gradually

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  1. Failing to assess pulmonary vascular resistance before closure

    • Critical to avoid closing shunts in Eisenmenger physiology
  2. Overlooking multiple shunts

    • Complete assessment of all potential shunts is essential before intervention
  3. Inadequate imaging

    • Relying solely on transthoracic echo may miss additional shunts
    • CMR or TEE often needed for complete evaluation 1
  4. Inappropriate timing of intervention

    • Waiting too long may lead to irreversible pulmonary vascular disease
    • Intervening too early may be unnecessary for small, hemodynamically insignificant shunts

The management approach to both types of shunts must prioritize prevention of irreversible pulmonary vascular disease while optimizing cardiac function and preventing complications like heart failure, stroke, and exercise intolerance.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.