What is the risk for surgical site infection (SSI) in a patient with complex medical history undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery with chlorhexidine gluconate in alcohol for preoperative skin antisepsis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 29, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Surgical Site Infection Risk with Chlorhexidine Gluconate in Alcohol for CABG Surgery

There is no increased risk for deep incisional SSI, organ space SSI, or superficial SSI when using chlorhexidine gluconate in alcohol for preoperative skin antisepsis in this patient undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Understanding Surgical Site Infections

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are classified into three distinct categories according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1:

  1. Superficial incisional SSI: Involves only subcutaneous tissue, occurs within 30 days of surgery
  2. Deep incisional SSI: Involves deep soft tissues, occurs within 30 days (or up to 1 year with implant)
  3. Organ/space SSI: Involves any anatomical part opened during surgery

Chlorhexidine Gluconate in Alcohol vs. Other Antiseptic Solutions

The choice of preoperative skin antisepsis solution is critical in preventing SSIs. Current evidence supports the use of chlorhexidine gluconate in alcohol:

  • A high-quality, multicenter, international trial demonstrated that chlorhexidine-alcohol solution is associated with a lower rate of surgical site infections compared to povidone-iodine solution 2
  • A study specifically examining skin preparation before harvest of long saphenous vein used in CABG found that 70% isopropyl alcohol containing 2% CHG was more effective at reducing microorganisms on the skin perioperatively compared to 0.5% CHG/70% IPA 3

Patient-Specific Risk Factors

The patient in question has multiple risk factors for SSI:

  • End-stage renal disease requiring dialysis
  • Type 2 diabetes mellitus
  • Recent myocardial infarction
  • Multiple comorbidities

However, these risk factors are independent of the antiseptic solution used. The Surgical Site Infection Risk Score (SSIRS) identifies factors such as smoking, increased BMI, peripheral vascular disease, metastatic cancer, chronic steroid use, recent sepsis, surgical urgency, increased ASA class, longer operation duration, infected wounds, and general anesthesia as contributing to SSI risk 4, but these do not interact specifically with the choice of chlorhexidine gluconate in alcohol.

Evidence on Antiseptic Solutions and SSI Types

The evidence does not suggest that chlorhexidine gluconate in alcohol increases the risk for any type of SSI (superficial, deep incisional, or organ/space) compared to other antiseptic solutions. In fact:

  1. The World Society of Emergency Surgery guidelines state that "skin preparation with chlorhexidine-alcoholic solution is associated with a lower rate of surgical site infections, compared to povidone-iodine solution" and gives this recommendation a strong grade 2

  2. A study comparing 2% CHG/70% IPA with 0.5% CHG/70% IPA for skin preparation in CABG patients found that the 2% concentration resulted in fewer detectable microorganisms perioperatively and a trend toward lower superficial SSI rates (though not statistically significant) 3

Conclusion

Based on the available evidence, using chlorhexidine gluconate in alcohol for preoperative skin antisepsis in this patient with multiple comorbidities undergoing CABG surgery does not increase the risk for any type of SSI compared to other antiseptic solutions. In fact, current evidence suggests it may be superior to alternatives like povidone-iodine.

The patient's underlying conditions (diabetes, renal disease, etc.) do increase his overall SSI risk, but this is independent of the antiseptic solution choice. Proper application of chlorhexidine gluconate in alcohol, along with other preventive measures like appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis, is recommended for this high-risk patient.

Related Questions

What is the risk for surgical site infection (SSI) in a patient with complex medical history undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery with chlorhexidine gluconate in alcohol for preoperative skin antisepsis?
What is the most appropriate intervention when a nurse witnesses a colleague using non-sterile technique during a wound dressing change, increasing the risk of infection?
What is the treatment for an infected bump on the leg?
What is the definition, epidemiology, etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of surgical site infections?
What are the potential complications for an elderly patient with hypertension (HTN), diabetes mellitus (DM), and a 40-year smoking history, who underwent thrombolysis for stenosis and has a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level of 7%?
Should a mechanically ventilated patient in shock receive pantoprazole (Proton Pump Inhibitor) 40 mg IV daily as stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) to reduce the risk of clinically important upper gastrointestinal bleeding?
What is a possible limitation of the PREP-IT (Preoperative Preparation with Iodine) study?
What is the management approach for an infant with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) and contracture?
What are the considerations for using Jardiance (Empagliflozin) in patients with a history of urosepsis?
What is the preferred preoperative skin antisepsis agent for a patient with hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and colon adenocarcinoma undergoing colon resection to prevent surgical site infection (SSI)?
What is the next step in management for a patient with progressive chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) with increasing white blood cell (WBC) and lymphocyte counts?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.