What is the correct conclusion from the SABATO trial regarding hospital stay durations for patients switching to oral therapy versus those receiving intravenous therapy?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 29, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

SABATO Trial Outcomes: Hospital Stay Duration

Patients who switched to oral therapy had significantly shorter hospital stays than did patients who received intravenous therapy in the SABATO trial.

Understanding the SABATO Trial

The SABATO (Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia Antibiotic Treatment Options) trial was designed to evaluate whether early oral switch therapy (OST) is non-inferior to conventional intravenous standard therapy (IST) in patients with low-risk Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection 1. This trial specifically examined outcomes including hospital length of stay and complications related to therapy.

Key Findings Regarding Hospital Stay Duration

The trial demonstrated that patients who were switched to oral therapy experienced significantly shorter hospital stays compared to those who remained on intravenous therapy. This finding aligns with established evidence that early switch to oral antibiotics can reduce length of hospitalization without compromising patient outcomes.

Supporting Evidence from Guidelines

The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and American Thoracic Society (ATS) consensus guidelines support this approach, stating that patients should be discharged as soon as they are clinically stable, have no other active medical problems, and have a safe environment for continued care 2. Furthermore, they explicitly note that "inpatient observation while receiving oral therapy is not necessary" and that continuing intravenous therapy unnecessarily "only adds to cost and length of stay, without any measurable clinical benefit" 2.

Criteria for Safe Oral Switch

For safe transition to oral therapy, patients should meet specific criteria:

  • Improvement in clinical symptoms (cough, dyspnea)
  • Afebrile status (≤100°F) for at least 8 hours
  • Decreasing white blood cell count
  • Functioning gastrointestinal tract with adequate oral intake 2, 3

Most non-ICU patients meet these criteria within the first 3-7 days of hospitalization 2, 3.

Additional Benefits of Early Oral Switch

Beyond shorter hospital stays, early switch to oral antibiotics offers several advantages:

  • Fewer complications related to intravenous therapy
  • Reduced healthcare costs
  • Improved patient comfort and mobility
  • Lower risk of hospital-acquired infections 4, 5, 6

Specific Patient Considerations

It's important to note that while early oral switch therapy is beneficial for most patients, certain populations require special consideration:

  • Patients with S. aureus bacteremia generally need longer IV therapy to prevent complications like endocarditis 2, 3
  • Patients with severe infections or immunocompromised status may require extended IV therapy 3

Conclusion on SABATO Trial Outcomes

The SABATO trial provides important evidence that early switch to oral antibiotics significantly reduces hospital length of stay compared to continued intravenous therapy in appropriate candidates. This finding is consistent with other studies showing that sequential intravenous-to-oral antibiotic therapy can reduce hospitalization duration by approximately 6-7 days 4, 7.

This approach represents an important strategy for improving healthcare efficiency while maintaining positive patient outcomes in terms of morbidity, mortality, and quality of life.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Antibiotic Switch Therapy

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Effectiveness of sequential intravenous-to-oral antibiotic switch therapy in hospitalized patients with gram-positive infection: the SEQUENCE cohort study.

European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2016

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.