ECG Interpretation by Qualified Physicians
ECGs must always be interpreted by qualified physicians with formal training, as computer algorithms have significant limitations with error rates up to 75% for certain conditions, and incorrect interpretations can significantly impact patient morbidity and mortality. 1
Qualifications and Competency Requirements
A qualified physician interpreter should have:
- Formal training in ECG interpretation during residency or fellowship
- Understanding of cardiac electrophysiology and pathophysiology
- Experience relating ECG findings to clinical context
- Ability to identify technical artifacts 1
Competency development requires:
Limitations of Computer Interpretation
- Computer ECG analysis should only be used as an adjunct to physician interpretation, not a replacement 2
- Only 0-94% of disorders are correctly classified by computer algorithms, with arrhythmias being particularly problematic 2, 1
- Error rates are significant: 40.7% for acute myocardial infarction and 75% for high-degree AV blocks 1
Systematic Approach to ECG Interpretation
A qualified physician should follow a systematic approach:
Verify technical quality:
- Check lead placement and recording quality
- Confirm calibration (standard: 10 mm/mV, 25 mm/s)
- Ensure adequate bandwidth (≥150 Hz for adults, ≥250 Hz for children) 1
Analyze key components:
- Rate: Normal sinus rhythm (60-100 bpm), bradycardia (<60 bpm), tachycardia (>100 bpm)
- Rhythm: Regular vs. irregular
- Intervals: PR (120-200 ms), QRS (<120 ms), QT/QTc (<450 ms in men, <460 ms in women)
- Axis: Normal vs. deviation
- Chamber abnormalities: Hypertrophy, enlargement
- ST-T changes: Ischemia, infarction, repolarization abnormalities 1
Integrate with clinical context:
- ECG findings must be interpreted in light of the patient's clinical situation
- Previous ECGs should be compared when available 1
Common Pitfalls in ECG Interpretation
- Major interpretation errors are common (4-33%) even among trained physicians 2, 1
- Misplacement of electrodes (especially V1/V2 placed too high) can lead to inaccurate interpretations 1
- Over-reliance on computer interpretation without physician verification 1
- Failure to consider clinical context when interpreting findings 1
Maintaining ECG Interpretation Skills
- Continuing medical education through seminars or self-assessment programs is encouraged, especially for physicians who read ECGs infrequently 2
- Periodic objective assessment of interpretation skills in clinical context is more important than completing a minimum number of interpretations 1
- Online learning modules have shown effectiveness in improving ECG interpretation skills, with studies showing 18.2% absolute increase in accuracy after module completion 3
Current State of ECG Interpretation Accuracy
- Accuracy varies widely by training level: 42% for medical students, 55.8% for residents, 68.5% for practicing physicians, and 74.9% for cardiologists 4
- Even after educational interventions, deficiencies in ECG interpretation persist across all training levels 4
- Web-based learning offers a promising approach to improving ECG interpretation skills 5, with perceptual and adaptive learning modules showing significant improvements in both accuracy and fluency of ECG interpretation 6