Is flexible ureteroscopy (Flexible Ureteroscopy) with laser fragmentation and Double J (DJ) stent insertion indicated for multiple right renal stones, with the largest stone located in the mid calyceal position, measuring 7 x 5 mm in dimensions and 1100 Hounsfield Units (HU) in density?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 31, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of Multiple Right Renal Stones with Mid-Calyceal Stone of 7 x 5 mm

Flexible ureteroscopy with laser fragmentation and DJ stent insertion is an appropriate and effective treatment option for the described 7 x 5 mm mid-calyceal renal stone with 1100 HU density. 1, 2

Treatment Decision Algorithm

Stone Characteristics Assessment:

  • Stone size: 7 x 5 mm (less than 10 mm)
  • Location: Mid-calyceal position
  • Density: 1100 HU (relatively hard stone)
  • Multiple stones present
  • No significant back pressure obstructive changes

Recommended Approach:

  1. First-line treatment: Flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) with laser fragmentation and DJ stent insertion

    • High success rate for mid-calyceal stones of this size (86-91% stone-free rate) 1
    • Particularly effective for stones with high density (1100 HU) that may be resistant to SWL
    • Allows treatment of multiple stones in a single session
  2. Alternative option: Shock Wave Lithotripsy (SWL)

    • Less invasive but potentially less effective for mid-calyceal stones
    • Mid-ureteral stones pose targeting challenges for SWL due to overlying bone 1
    • Lower success rates for stones with high density (>1000 HU)

Evidence Supporting This Decision

The American Urological Association guidelines indicate that ureteroscopic management of mid-ureteral stones is highly successful, with stone-free rates of 86% for stones in this location 1. For stones <10 mm like the one described (7 x 5 mm), the success rate is even higher at approximately 91% 1.

Flexible ureteroscopy offers several advantages in this case:

  • Allows direct visualization of all stones
  • Provides access to mid-calyceal location
  • Effective fragmentation of high-density stones (1100 HU) using laser
  • Permits removal of multiple stones in a single procedure
  • Low complication rates (ureteral perforation <5%, stricture formation <2%) 1

Technical Considerations

  • Access: A flexible ureteroscope is ideal for accessing mid-calyceal stones
  • Fragmentation: Holmium:YAG laser is effective for high-density stones
  • DJ stent placement: Recommended post-procedure to prevent obstruction from residual fragments and edema
  • Expected outcomes: High likelihood of complete stone clearance (86-91%) in a single procedure 1

Potential Complications and Mitigation

  • Ureteral injury: Risk is <5% and can be minimized with careful technique 1
  • Long-term stricture: Occurs in <2% of cases 1
  • Infection: Appropriate perioperative antibiotics if indicated
  • Stent discomfort: Temporary and manageable with analgesics

Follow-up Recommendations

  • Imaging (KUB X-ray or ultrasound) within 1-2 weeks to monitor stone position and clearance 2
  • DJ stent removal typically after 2-3 weeks
  • Increased fluid intake (>2L/day) to help prevent recurrent stone formation 2

The high stone-free rates, minimal invasiveness, and ability to treat multiple stones make flexible ureteroscopy with laser fragmentation and DJ stent insertion the most appropriate treatment option for this patient's mid-calyceal stone.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Management of Ureteral Stones

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.