Diagnostic Algorithm for Pulmonary Embolism
The diagnostic approach for pulmonary embolism should follow a structured algorithm based on hemodynamic status, clinical probability assessment, D-dimer testing, and appropriate imaging, with CT pulmonary angiography being the first-line imaging test for most patients. 1, 2
Initial Assessment: Hemodynamic Status
The first step in the diagnostic algorithm is to determine the patient's hemodynamic status:
For Patients with Hemodynamic Instability (High-Risk PE Suspected):
Bedside transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) should be performed immediately 1
- If TTE shows right ventricular (RV) dysfunction without other obvious cause, consider PE likely
- In critically unstable patients, echocardiographic evidence of RV dysfunction is sufficient to prompt immediate reperfusion without further testing
If CT is immediately available and patient can be transported safely:
- Proceed to CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA)
- If CTPA confirms PE, initiate appropriate treatment
- If CTPA is negative, search for alternative causes of shock
If CT is not immediately available or patient cannot be transported:
- Consider additional bedside tests:
- Transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) to visualize thrombi in pulmonary arteries
- Compression ultrasonography (CUS) to detect DVT, which would support PE diagnosis
- Consider additional bedside tests:
![Diagnostic algorithm for suspected high-risk PE with hemodynamic instability]
For Hemodynamically Stable Patients (Non-High-Risk PE Suspected):
Step 1: Clinical Probability Assessment
Use validated clinical prediction rules to assess pre-test probability:
- Wells Score or Revised Geneva Score 1, 2
- Can be used as three-level (low/intermediate/high) or two-level (PE-unlikely/PE-likely) classification
Revised Geneva Score components:
- Previous PE or DVT: 3 points (original) or 1 point (simplified)
- Heart rate 75-94 bpm: 3 points (original) or 1 point (simplified)
- Heart rate ≥95 bpm: 5 points (original) or 2 points (simplified)
- Surgery or fracture within past month: 2 points (original) or 1 point (simplified)
- Hemoptysis: 2 points (original) or 1 point (simplified)
- Active cancer: 2 points (original) or 1 point (simplified)
- Unilateral lower-limb pain: 3 points (original) or 1 point (simplified)
- Pain on lower-limb deep venous palpation and unilateral edema: 4 points (original) or 1 point (simplified)
- Age >65 years: 1 point (both versions)
Step 2: D-dimer Testing
For low or intermediate clinical probability (or PE-unlikely):
For high clinical probability (or PE-likely):
- D-dimer testing is not recommended due to low negative predictive value
- Proceed directly to imaging 1
Alternative D-dimer approach (YEARS algorithm): 1
- For patients with no YEARS items (signs of DVT, hemoptysis, PE most likely diagnosis): PE excluded if D-dimer <1000 ng/mL
- For patients with ≥1 YEARS item: PE excluded if D-dimer <500 ng/mL
Step 3: Imaging
First-line imaging: CT Pulmonary Angiography (CTPA) 1
- Allows visualization of pulmonary arteries down to subsegmental level
- Sensitivity 83%, specificity 96%
- A negative CTPA adequately excludes PE in patients with low/intermediate clinical probability
- If CTPA positive, treat for PE
When CTPA is contraindicated or unavailable:
- Ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) lung scintigraphy or V/Q SPECT
- Lower limb compression ultrasonography (CUS) to detect DVT
Special considerations:
- For patients with high clinical probability and negative CTPA, consider further testing
- For pregnant patients, both CTPA and V/Q scan can be used safely with appropriate protocols 2
![Diagnostic algorithm for suspected PE without hemodynamic instability]
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
Failing to assess clinical probability before ordering tests, which should guide the diagnostic approach 1
Inappropriate use of D-dimer testing:
- Using D-dimer in high clinical probability patients
- Not using age-adjusted cutoffs in elderly patients
- Relying on point-of-care D-dimer tests which have lower sensitivity (88% vs. 95% for laboratory tests) 1
Misinterpreting single subsegmental PE on CTPA, which may be a false positive 2
Delaying anticoagulation in patients with high clinical probability while awaiting confirmatory tests 2
Overreliance on clinical signs and symptoms alone, which are often nonspecific (chest pain, dyspnea, tachycardia) 1
Misinterpreting normal oxygen saturation as ruling out PE (up to 40% of PE patients have normal SaO2) 1
Not considering PE in pregnant patients due to concern about radiation exposure 2
By following this structured diagnostic algorithm, clinicians can effectively diagnose or exclude PE while minimizing unnecessary testing and treatment delays that could impact patient mortality and morbidity.