How to grade right ventricular (RV) dysfunction on 2-dimensional (2D) echocardiography?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 1, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Grading Right Ventricular Dysfunction on 2D Echocardiography

Right ventricular dysfunction should be graded using a comprehensive multiparametric approach that includes RV fractional area change (FAC), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), and tissue Doppler-derived tricuspid annular systolic velocity (S') as the primary parameters for assessment. 1, 2

Primary Parameters for RV Function Assessment

1. RV Fractional Area Change (FAC)

  • Obtain RV-focused apical four-chamber view
  • Trace RV endocardial border at end-diastole and end-systole
  • Calculate: FAC (%) = [(RVEDA - RVESA)/RVEDA] × 100
  • Normal value: 49 ± 7%
  • Abnormal: <35%
  • Has established prognostic value and correlates well with RV ejection fraction by CMR 1, 2, 3

2. Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion (TAPSE)

  • Measure M-mode displacement of tricuspid annulus in systole
  • Normal value: >17 mm
  • Abnormal: <17 mm
  • Easy to perform with high reproducibility but less suitable for serial assessment 1, 2

3. Tissue Doppler S' Velocity

  • Measure peak systolic velocity at tricuspid annulus
  • Normal value: >9.5 cm/sec (pulsed Doppler)
  • Abnormal: <9.5 cm/sec
  • Reflects longitudinal RV function 2

Secondary Parameters

4. Myocardial Performance Index (MPI/Tei Index)

  • Calculate using: MPI = (TCO - ET)/ET (pulsed Doppler) or MPI = (IVCT + IVRT)/ET (tissue Doppler)
  • Normal value: 0.26 ± 0.085 (pulsed Doppler); 0.38 ± 0.08 (tissue Doppler)
  • Abnormal: >0.43 (pulsed Doppler); >0.54 (tissue Doppler)
  • Advantage: Less affected by heart rate
  • Limitation: Unreliable when RA pressure is elevated 2

5. RV Free Wall Longitudinal Strain

  • Measure peak systolic strain of RV free wall segments
  • Normal value: >-20%
  • Abnormal: >-20% (less negative)
  • Shows highest specificity (92%) for detecting RV dysfunction compared to 3D-derived RVEF 4
  • Can detect RV dysfunction when other parameters are normal 1

RV Size Assessment (Required for Complete Evaluation)

  • Measure in RV-focused apical four-chamber view:
    • RV basal diameter: normal 25-41 mm
    • RV mid diameter: normal 19-35 mm
    • RV longitudinal diameter: normal 59-83 mm 1

Grading Algorithm

  1. Normal RV function:

    • FAC ≥35%
    • TAPSE ≥17 mm
    • S' ≥9.5 cm/sec
    • Normal RV size
  2. Mild RV dysfunction:

    • One abnormal parameter (FAC, TAPSE, or S')
    • Normal or mildly increased RV size
  3. Moderate RV dysfunction:

    • Two abnormal parameters
    • Moderate RV enlargement
  4. Severe RV dysfunction:

    • All three primary parameters abnormal
    • Severe RV enlargement
    • Additional findings: moderate/severe tricuspid regurgitation, increased RA pressure 5

Clinical Pearls and Pitfalls

  • When all three parameters (FAC, TAPSE, S') are abnormal, sensitivity for detecting significant RV dysfunction is 91% with negative predictive value of 96% 6
  • TAPSE and S' may be misleading in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation 1
  • FAC correlates best with MRI-derived RVEF (r = 0.80) compared to other 2D measures 3
  • Subjective visual assessment alone is insufficient and should be avoided 7
  • RV free wall strain shows the closest association with 3D-derived RVEF cutoffs 4
  • 3D echocardiography for RV volume and EF assessment should be considered when available and expertise exists, but is not required for routine grading 1

By systematically applying these parameters, clinicians can effectively grade RV dysfunction, which has significant implications for patient morbidity and mortality across various cardiovascular conditions.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.