Interpretation of NT-proBNP Level of 125 pg/mL for Heart Failure Assessment
An NT-proBNP level of 125 pg/mL effectively rules out chronic heart failure, as this value is at the exact threshold used to exclude chronic HF in non-acute settings. 1
Diagnostic Value of NT-proBNP at 125 pg/mL
Rule-Out Value
- NT-proBNP of 125 pg/mL is the established cut-off point for excluding chronic heart failure in non-acute settings 1
- This threshold has a high negative predictive value (94-98%), making it excellent for ruling out heart failure 1
- For acute heart failure assessment, a higher threshold of 300 pg/mL is used for exclusion 1
Clinical Context Considerations
- While 125 pg/mL is exactly at the threshold, interpretation should consider:
- Age: Age-adjusted thresholds are more specific for diagnosing acute HF (450 pg/mL for <50 years, 900 pg/mL for 50-75 years, and 1800 pg/mL for >75 years) 1
- Body mass index: Obesity can lower NT-proBNP levels, potentially causing false negatives 2
- Renal function: Impaired kidney function (GFR <60 mL/min/1.73m²) can elevate NT-proBNP levels 1
Algorithm for Clinical Decision-Making
For chronic heart failure assessment:
- NT-proBNP = 125 pg/mL → At the exact threshold for ruling out chronic HF
- If patient has no symptoms or signs of HF → Heart failure is effectively ruled out
- If patient has symptoms or signs of HF → Further cardiac evaluation is warranted despite borderline value
For acute heart failure assessment:
- NT-proBNP = 125 pg/mL → Well below the 300 pg/mL threshold for ruling out acute HF
- Acute heart failure is very unlikely regardless of age 1
Special considerations:
- In obese patients (BMI >35 kg/m²): 125 pg/mL may not reliably exclude HF, as obesity can lower NT-proBNP levels by 20-30% 1, 2
- In elderly patients (>75 years): 125 pg/mL strongly excludes HF, as age typically increases NT-proBNP levels 1
- In patients with atrial fibrillation: 125 pg/mL strongly excludes HF, as AF typically increases NT-proBNP levels by 20-30% 1
Clinical Implications
- The 2016 ESC guidelines recommend NT-proBNP testing as an initial diagnostic step when echocardiography is not immediately available 1
- A value of 125 pg/mL has high negative predictive value but lower positive predictive value (44-57%) in non-acute settings 1
- Even with a borderline value, clinical assessment remains crucial - symptoms (dyspnea, orthopnea) and signs (edema, jugular venous distention) should guide further evaluation 3
Pitfalls and Caveats
- NT-proBNP at exactly 125 pg/mL represents a borderline value that warrants careful interpretation
- False negatives can occur in obese patients, where HFpEF may be present despite NT-proBNP levels below 125 pg/mL 2
- False positives can occur with advanced age, renal dysfunction, and atrial fibrillation 1
- NT-proBNP should not be used in isolation but interpreted alongside clinical findings and other diagnostic tests, particularly echocardiography 1, 3
In summary, an NT-proBNP level of 125 pg/mL effectively rules out chronic heart failure in most clinical scenarios, but interpretation should be adjusted based on patient characteristics, particularly obesity, which can lead to falsely low values.