Treatment Differences Between Sialolithiasis and Parotitis
The primary treatment difference is that sialolithiasis requires stone removal through conservative or surgical approaches, while parotitis typically requires antibiotics and supportive measures without stone extraction. 1, 2
Sialolithiasis Treatment
Diagnostic Approach
- CT without IV contrast is the preferred imaging modality for identifying sialoliths as it provides better delineation of stones compared to MRI 1
- Ultrasound can be useful for localization and identifying features of stones 1
- In non-acute settings, CT or MRI sialography may provide detailed assessment of duct obstruction 1
Treatment Algorithm
Conservative Management (for small, accessible stones)
Minimally Invasive Approaches (for accessible stones)
Surgical Management (for inaccessible or large stones)
Parotitis Treatment
Diagnostic Approach
- CT face/neck with IV contrast is commonly used to evaluate suspected parotid inflammation 1
- MRI with and without contrast may be used to assess extent of inflammation and possible complications 1
- Noninvasive MRI sialography may be helpful in cases of acute parotitis with suspected duct obstruction 1
Treatment Algorithm
Medical Management
For Chronic/Recurrent Parotitis
For Severe Cases Unresponsive to Other Treatments
- Salivary gland radiation therapy (reserved for experienced centers due to risk of irreversible dryness) 7
Key Differences and Clinical Pearls
Primary Focus:
Antibiotic Use:
Long-term Management:
Common Pitfalls:
- Failing to identify stones in cases of recurrent parotitis
- Treating only the infection in sialolithiasis without addressing the stone
- Overlooking the possibility of malignancy in cases of persistent parotid swelling
- Using radiation therapy for parotitis outside of experienced centers 7
Follow-up:
- Regular evaluation of treatment response is recommended for both conditions
- For chronic sialorrhea associated with parotitis, regular screening for dysphagia is recommended 7