Definition of Exercise-Induced Pulmonary Hypertension
Exercise-induced pulmonary hypertension (EIPH) is no longer recognized as a formal clinical entity due to lack of reliable data defining which exercise-induced changes in mean pulmonary arterial pressure or pulmonary vascular resistance have prognostic implications. 1
Current Consensus on Pulmonary Hypertension Definitions
The 2015 ESC/ERS guidelines clearly state that pulmonary hypertension (PH) is defined as:
- An increase in mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) ≥25 mmHg at rest as assessed by right heart catheterization 1
- The normal mPAP at rest is 14 ± 3 mmHg with an upper limit of normal of approximately 20 mmHg 1
Historical Context
Previously, exercise-induced PH was defined as:
- A mean pulmonary artery pressure >30 mmHg during exercise in the absence of pulmonary venous hypertension 1
- This definition was included in earlier guidelines but has since been abandoned 1
Why EIPH Is No Longer a Recognized Clinical Entity
The 2015 ESC/ERS guidelines explicitly state that "due to the lack of reliable data that define which levels of exercise-induced changes in mPAP or PVR have prognostic implications, a disease entity 'PH on exercise' cannot be defined and should not be used." 1
Key reasons for abandoning this concept include:
- Lack of standardized exercise protocols
- Absence of validated normal reference values
- Insufficient evidence linking exercise-induced hemodynamic changes to clinical outcomes
- Difficulty distinguishing pathological from physiological responses
Recent Research Perspectives
Despite the official guidelines, research interest in EIPH continues:
Some researchers propose defining EIPH using a combination of parameters:
- Mean PAP >30 mmHg at a cardiac output <10 L/min
- Total pulmonary vascular resistance >3 Wood units at maximum exercise 2
Others suggest using the mPAP/cardiac output slope (>3 mmHg/L/min) as a more reliable indicator than absolute pressure measurements 3
Studies have shown that EIPH may represent an early, mild phase of the PAH spectrum, physiologically intermediate between normal and resting PAH 4
Clinical Implications
For patients with suspected early pulmonary vascular disease:
- Careful follow-up is recommended for patients with mPAP between 21-24 mmHg at rest, especially those at risk for developing PAH 1
- This includes patients with connective tissue disease and family members of patients with heritable PAH
Diagnostic Approach
Current diagnostic algorithms focus on resting hemodynamics:
- Right heart catheterization remains the gold standard for PH diagnosis
- PH is classified based on hemodynamic criteria:
Conclusion
While exercise testing may provide valuable physiological insights, the concept of exercise-induced pulmonary hypertension as a distinct clinical entity has been removed from current guidelines due to insufficient evidence supporting its diagnostic criteria and prognostic significance.