What is exercise-induced pulmonary hypertension?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 2, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Definition of Exercise-Induced Pulmonary Hypertension

Exercise-induced pulmonary hypertension (EIPH) is no longer recognized as a formal clinical entity due to lack of reliable data defining which exercise-induced changes in mean pulmonary arterial pressure or pulmonary vascular resistance have prognostic implications. 1

Current Consensus on Pulmonary Hypertension Definitions

The 2015 ESC/ERS guidelines clearly state that pulmonary hypertension (PH) is defined as:

  • An increase in mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) ≥25 mmHg at rest as assessed by right heart catheterization 1
  • The normal mPAP at rest is 14 ± 3 mmHg with an upper limit of normal of approximately 20 mmHg 1

Historical Context

Previously, exercise-induced PH was defined as:

  • A mean pulmonary artery pressure >30 mmHg during exercise in the absence of pulmonary venous hypertension 1
  • This definition was included in earlier guidelines but has since been abandoned 1

Why EIPH Is No Longer a Recognized Clinical Entity

The 2015 ESC/ERS guidelines explicitly state that "due to the lack of reliable data that define which levels of exercise-induced changes in mPAP or PVR have prognostic implications, a disease entity 'PH on exercise' cannot be defined and should not be used." 1

Key reasons for abandoning this concept include:

  • Lack of standardized exercise protocols
  • Absence of validated normal reference values
  • Insufficient evidence linking exercise-induced hemodynamic changes to clinical outcomes
  • Difficulty distinguishing pathological from physiological responses

Recent Research Perspectives

Despite the official guidelines, research interest in EIPH continues:

  • Some researchers propose defining EIPH using a combination of parameters:

    • Mean PAP >30 mmHg at a cardiac output <10 L/min
    • Total pulmonary vascular resistance >3 Wood units at maximum exercise 2
  • Others suggest using the mPAP/cardiac output slope (>3 mmHg/L/min) as a more reliable indicator than absolute pressure measurements 3

  • Studies have shown that EIPH may represent an early, mild phase of the PAH spectrum, physiologically intermediate between normal and resting PAH 4

Clinical Implications

For patients with suspected early pulmonary vascular disease:

  • Careful follow-up is recommended for patients with mPAP between 21-24 mmHg at rest, especially those at risk for developing PAH 1
  • This includes patients with connective tissue disease and family members of patients with heritable PAH

Diagnostic Approach

Current diagnostic algorithms focus on resting hemodynamics:

  1. Right heart catheterization remains the gold standard for PH diagnosis
  2. PH is classified based on hemodynamic criteria:
    • Pre-capillary PH: mPAP ≥25 mmHg, PAWP ≤15 mmHg, PVR >3 Wood units
    • Post-capillary PH: mPAP ≥25 mmHg, PAWP >15 mmHg 1, 5

Conclusion

While exercise testing may provide valuable physiological insights, the concept of exercise-induced pulmonary hypertension as a distinct clinical entity has been removed from current guidelines due to insufficient evidence supporting its diagnostic criteria and prognostic significance.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Pulmonary Hypertension Diagnosis and Classification

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.