Normal Pulmonary Function Test (PFT) Parameters
A normal pulmonary function test (PFT) is defined by values that fall above the lower limit of normal (LLN), which is set at the 5th percentile of a healthy reference population, rather than using fixed percentage cutoffs. 1
Key Parameters for Normal PFTs
Spirometry
- FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second): Above LLN (typically >80% predicted, but varies by age)
- FVC (Forced Vital Capacity): Above LLN (typically >80% predicted, but varies by age)
- FEV1/FVC ratio: Above LLN (not the fixed 0.70 cutoff)
- Quality: Grade A, B, or C maneuvers (at least 3 acceptable efforts with 2 repeatable ones) 1
Lung Volumes
- TLC (Total Lung Capacity): Between LLN and ULN (Upper Limit of Normal)
- RV (Residual Volume): Between LLN and ULN
- FRC (Functional Residual Capacity): Between LLN and ULN
- VC (Vital Capacity): Above LLN
- IC (Inspiratory Capacity): Above LLN
Diffusion Capacity (DLCO)
- DLCO: Above LLN (typically >75-80% predicted)
- KCO (Transfer Coefficient): Above LLN
- VA (Alveolar Volume): Above LLN
- Quality: Grade A maneuvers (VI/VC >90% or VI/VC >85% with VA within 0.200 L or 5% of VA from another acceptable maneuver) 1
Interpretation Framework
Z-scores vs. Percent Predicted
- Z-score: More accurate representation of normality than percent predicted
- Normal range is typically between -1.64 and +1.64 (5th to 95th percentile) 1
- Percent predicted: Should not be used alone to define abnormality as LLN varies with age, height, and sex 1
Reference Values
- Spirometry: Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI-2012) equations are recommended 1
- DLCO: GLI-2017 reference equations are recommended 1
- Lung volumes: No universal recommendation yet, but international projects are underway 1
Common Pitfalls in PFT Interpretation
Fixed Cutoff Errors
- Using fixed cutoffs (e.g., 80% predicted for FVC or 0.70 for FEV1/FVC) instead of LLN leads to:
- Overdiagnosis in elderly and shorter individuals
- Underdiagnosis in younger and taller individuals
- Sex bias in clinical assessments 1
Quality Assessment Issues
- Failure to assess test quality can lead to erroneous interpretation
- Tests with poor quality grades (D, E, F) should be interpreted with caution or repeated 1
- For DLCO, only grade A maneuvers should be used when available 1
Reference Value Selection
- Using inappropriate reference equations for the population being tested
- Not accounting for ethnic differences in lung function 1
Clinical Application
Test Selection Algorithm
- Start with spirometry to assess for obstructive or restrictive patterns
- Add lung volumes if restriction is suspected (reduced FVC with normal/high FEV1/FVC)
- Include DLCO to assess gas exchange, particularly important for:
Special Considerations
Isolated DLCO reduction (normal spirometry and lung volumes) may indicate:
FVC/DLCO ratio >1.4 with reduced DLCO may suggest pulmonary vascular disease, particularly in connective tissue diseases 4, 5
Serial measurements are more valuable than single measurements for detecting disease progression or treatment response 2
Remember that PFT results must always be interpreted in the clinical context, as values near the LLN have inherent uncertainty and should not be used alone for definitive diagnosis 1.