What lab tests are used to evaluate a protein gap?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 2, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Lab Tests for Evaluating Protein Gap

The most effective lab tests for evaluating a protein gap include serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP), serum free light chain assay, quantitative immunoglobulin levels, and albumin-to-creatinine ratio or protein-to-creatinine ratio in urine samples. 1

Primary Testing Methods

Serum Protein Electrophoresis (SPEP)

  • Separates serum proteins into five main fractions:
    • Albumin
    • Alpha-1
    • Alpha-2
    • Beta
    • Gamma (typically comprises 10-20% of total protein)
  • Identifies abnormal patterns in protein distribution
  • Detects monoclonal proteins ("M-spike") in the gamma region that may indicate:
    • Multiple myeloma
    • Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS)
    • Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia
    • Solitary plasmacytoma
    • Amyloidosis 1

Complementary Serum Tests

  • Serum immunofixation electrophoresis (SIFE): Identifies specific type of monoclonal protein
  • Quantitative immunoglobulin levels (IgG, IgA, IgM): Provides information about specific antibody types
  • Serum free light chain (FLC) assay: Essential for detecting light chain disease, especially when SPEP is negative but clinical suspicion remains high 1

Urine Testing Methods

Urine Protein Assessment

  • Albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) in untimed urine samples:
    • More accurate than protein concentration alone
    • Recommended over total protein for evaluation of proteinuria
    • More sensitive for detecting low-grade but clinically important albuminuria 2
  • Protein-to-creatinine ratio (PCR) in untimed urine samples:
    • Useful when albumin is not the primary protein of concern
    • More convenient than timed collections 2
  • 24-hour urine collection for protein electrophoresis (UPEP) and immunofixation (UIFE):
    • Gold standard for quantifying protein excretion
    • Recommended when a monoclonal spike is detected on SPEP 1

Interpretation Considerations

SPEP Pattern Analysis

  • Monoclonal pattern (sharp, narrow spike): Suggests plasma cell disorder
  • Polyclonal increase in gamma region: Indicates reactive or inflammatory process (infection, liver disease, autoimmune disorders)
  • Hypogammaglobulinemia: Consider immunodeficiency or protein-losing conditions 1

Factors Affecting Urine Protein Measurements

  • Urine concentration affects accuracy of protein/creatinine ratio:
    • Dilute urine (specific gravity ≤1.005) may overestimate protein excretion, especially with creatinine ≤38.8 mg/dL
    • Concentrated urine (specific gravity ≥1.015) may underestimate protein excretion, especially with creatinine ≥61.5 mg/dL 3
  • Dipstick protein measurements have limitations:
    • Poor negative predictive value (34%) for ruling out significant proteinuria
    • Good positive predictive value (92%) for dipstick values ≥1+ 4

Testing Algorithm

  1. Initial assessment:

    • SPEP with quantification of protein fractions
    • Serum free light chain assay
    • Quantitative immunoglobulin levels
  2. If monoclonal protein detected:

    • Serum immunofixation electrophoresis (SIFE)
    • 24-hour urine for protein electrophoresis (UPEP) and immunofixation (UIFE)
    • Consider bone marrow examination based on clinical suspicion
  3. If polyclonal increase detected:

    • Evaluate for underlying inflammatory or infectious conditions
    • Consider liver function tests, inflammatory markers
  4. If hypogammaglobulinemia detected:

    • Consider immunodeficiency evaluation
    • Assess for protein-losing conditions 1

Important Caveats

  • Consistent methodology is crucial for serial monitoring
  • Nonsecretory disease (approximately 3% of multiple myeloma patients) may have no detectable M-proteins on SPEP
  • Small M-proteins may be missed without complementary testing
  • Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies can be misinterpreted as disease-related proteins 1
  • Urine specific gravity should be considered when interpreting protein/creatinine ratios 3

By following this comprehensive approach to protein gap evaluation, clinicians can accurately diagnose and monitor conditions affecting protein metabolism, with direct impact on patient morbidity and mortality.

References

Guideline

Serum Protein Electrophoresis Interpretation

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Urinary dipstick protein: a poor predictor of absent or severe proteinuria.

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 1994

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.