How is crossmatching determined for a potential kidney donor and recipient, and what role do eplets (Human Leukocyte Antigens epitopes) play in this process?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 2, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Kidney Transplant Crossmatching and the Role of Eplets

Crossmatching for kidney transplantation is primarily performed using flow cytometry or complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) assays to detect recipient antibodies against donor HLA antigens, with the goal of preventing hyperacute rejection and graft failure.

Crossmatching Methods and Interpretation

Standard Crossmatching Techniques

  • Flow cytometry crossmatch: More sensitive method for detecting small quantities of alloantibodies 1
  • Complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) assay: Often enhanced with anti-human globulin (AHG) to increase sensitivity 1
  • Virtual crossmatch: Assessment of compatibility by analyzing recipient anti-HLA antibody profiles and donor HLA typing without mixing physical samples 2

Critical Components of Crossmatching

  1. Testing of informative recipient sera:

    • Historically highest Panel Reactive Antibody (PRA) sera
    • Current sera
    • Immediate pre-transplant sera 1
  2. Target cells:

    • Donor lymphoid cells (T and B cells)
    • Used to identify presence of IgG antibodies to donor HLA antigens 1
  3. Interpretation of results:

    • Positive flow cytometry or AHG-CDC crossmatch with IgG antibodies to HLA antigens is a contraindication to transplantation 1
    • Positive crossmatch without HLA antibodies is not a contraindication (may be directed against non-HLA antigens) 1
    • IgM-positive crossmatches are not contraindications to transplantation 1

Modern Approaches to Crossmatching

Virtual Crossmatch

  • Assesses compatibility by analyzing:
    • Recipient's anti-HLA antibody profile
    • Donor's HLA typing 2
  • Benefits include:
    • Reduction in cold ischemia time
    • No increase in hyperacute rejection episodes
    • Logistically less challenging than physical crossmatches 2

Advanced Detection Methods

  • Solid-phase immunoassays (SPI):

    • Can be used as the definitive test for donor-recipient compatibility 3
    • Some centers have successfully implemented transplantation protocols based on SPI rather than flow cytometric crossmatch 3
  • ELISA and Flow Bead PRA:

    • More sensitive methods using soluble HLA target antigens
    • Can detect IgG antibodies to HLA antigens in sera reported as non-reactive by other methods 1
    • Flow PRA can detect clinically relevant IgG antibodies that increase rejection risk 1

Understanding Eplets in Transplantation

While not explicitly described in the provided evidence, eplets are:

  • Small functional units (epitopes) of HLA molecules
  • Represent the actual binding sites for antibodies
  • More precise than traditional HLA antigen matching
  • Important in understanding the "shared epitope phenomenon" where antibody strength can be underrepresented due to binding to competing targets on multiple antigens 4

Potential Complications and Pitfalls

False Positive Results

  • Prior rituximab exposure of the kidney donor can lead to false positive B-cell crossmatches 5
  • This occurs because rituximab (anti-CD20) binds to B cells and can interfere with crossmatch testing

Shared Epitope Phenomenon

  • Can lead to underrepresentation of antibody strength or completely missed antibodies
  • Occurs when antibodies bind to competing targets on multiple antigens/beads
  • Results in "diluted" mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) readings 4

Special Considerations

ABO Compatibility

  • ABO compatibility is crucial for preventing hyperacute rejection
  • For ABO-incompatible transplants, special attention to blood product selection is required 6

Highly Sensitized Recipients

  • Patients with high PRA remain a clinical challenge
  • Desensitization protocols may include:
    • Plasmapheresis
    • Immunoadsorption
    • Intravenous immunoglobulin
    • Intensified immunosuppression 1

Previous Transplants

  • Matching donor-recipient HLA antigens is particularly important for patients with prior transplants
  • Strongly recommended not to re-expose a recipient to an HLA class II antigen of a previously rejected allograft 1

Algorithm for Crossmatching in Kidney Transplantation

  1. Initial screening:

    • ABO compatibility determination
    • HLA typing of donor and recipient 1
  2. Antibody detection:

    • Test recipient sera for presence of IgG antibodies to HLA antigens
    • Determine PRA status 1
  3. Crossmatch testing:

    • Flow cytometry or AHG-CDC crossmatch using highest PRA, current, and pre-transplant sera
    • Determine if positive results are due to IgG or IgM antibodies 1
  4. Result interpretation:

    • Negative crossmatch or IgM-positive: Proceed with transplantation
    • IgG-positive against HLA antigens: Contraindication to transplantation
    • Consider virtual crossmatch for risk stratification 2

By following this structured approach to crossmatching, transplant teams can minimize the risk of hyperacute rejection and optimize graft outcomes while making the most efficient use of available donor organs.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Renal Transplantation With Final Allocation Based on the Virtual Crossmatch.

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons, 2016

Guideline

Blood Transfusion Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.