Is it safe to use a gepant for acute migraine treatment in a patient already taking galcanezumab (CGRP-targeting monoclonal antibody) for migraine prevention?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 2, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Safety of Using Gepants with CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies for Migraine

There is limited but supportive evidence that using a gepant for acute migraine treatment in a patient already taking galcanezumab (CGRP-targeting monoclonal antibody) is safe and well-tolerated, making it a reasonable option for this patient experiencing breakthrough migraines.

Evidence for Combination Therapy

Recent real-world evidence supports the safety of combining CGRP-targeting therapies:

  • A 2024 retrospective study of 234 patients receiving both CGRP monoclonal antibodies and gepants found only three adverse events, which were mild and transient, not requiring treatment discontinuation 1.

  • A 2024 prospective study (COURAGE) demonstrated that ubrogepant was effective as an acute treatment when used with CGRP monoclonal antibodies, with 80.4% of patients achieving meaningful pain relief at 4 hours after the first attack 2.

  • A smaller 2020 study of 13 patients using rimegepant with various CGRP monoclonal antibodies (including galcanezumab) found no safety issues, with only mild to moderate adverse events reported 3.

Clinical Decision-Making Algorithm

For this 28-year-old woman with:

  1. 75% reduction in monthly migraine days with galcanezumab
  2. Breakthrough migraines in the week before next dose
  3. Previous failure of conventional acute treatments

The decision pathway should be:

  1. Assess current response pattern

    • Patient has good overall response (75% reduction)
    • Breakthrough migraines occur predictably before next dose
  2. Consider treatment options

    • Continue galcanezumab as it provides significant benefit
    • Add gepant for acute treatment of breakthrough migraines
    • Monitor for any adverse effects from combination therapy

Guidelines and Evidence Gaps

Current guidelines acknowledge limitations in the evidence:

  • The 2025 American College of Physicians guideline notes that CGRP antagonists-gepants have "very little comparative evidence for prioritized outcomes" and that there are "evidence gaps" regarding newer migraine medications 4.

  • The 2024 VA/DoD headache guideline acknowledges that "robust head-to-head evidence is largely unavailable" for comparative efficacy of newer headache pharmacotherapies 4.

Important Considerations and Caveats

  • Cost implications: Gepants are significantly more expensive than traditional acute treatments, with annualized costs ranging from $4,959 to $5,994 for oral formulations 4.

  • Monitoring: Regular assessment of treatment efficacy and adverse effects is essential when combining these medications.

  • Alternative approaches: If combination therapy is ineffective or not tolerated, consider:

    • Adjusting the dosing schedule of galcanezumab
    • Trying a different class of acute treatment
    • Exploring non-pharmacological options like neuromodulation devices

Conclusion

While the American College of Physicians notes limited comparative evidence for gepants 4, the most recent real-world studies suggest that combining CGRP monoclonal antibodies with gepants is safe and can be effective 1, 2, 3. For this patient who has failed multiple conventional acute treatments but responds well to galcanezumab, adding a gepant for breakthrough migraines is a reasonable therapeutic option.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.