Management of Bradycardia After TMVR Procedure
Symptomatic bradycardia after TMVR requires permanent pacemaker implantation before discharge to prevent potentially fatal outcomes. 1
Understanding Bradycardia After Transcatheter Valve Procedures
Bradycardia following transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) is a recognized complication similar to what occurs after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), though with some important differences:
- While most evidence focuses on TAVR-related conduction disturbances, the principles apply to TMVR due to similar anatomical considerations
- The proximity of the mitral valve apparatus to the conduction system makes conduction disturbances a potential complication
- The risk of delayed high-degree atrioventricular block exists with both procedures
Assessment Algorithm
Immediate evaluation:
- Document the type and severity of bradycardia
- Compare with baseline ECG to identify new conduction abnormalities
- Assess for symptoms (syncope, pre-syncope, fatigue, dizziness)
Risk stratification:
- High risk: Symptomatic bradycardia of any type
- High risk: New high-degree AV block or complete heart block
- Moderate risk: New bundle branch block (especially RBBB)
- Lower risk: Transient bradycardia that resolves completely
Management Recommendations
For Symptomatic Bradycardia:
- Permanent pacemaker implantation is indicated before discharge for patients with symptomatic bradycardia after TMVR 1
- Do not delay PPM implantation while waiting for spontaneous resolution as this puts the patient at unnecessary risk 2
For Asymptomatic Bradycardia:
- For high-degree AV block or complete heart block: Permanent pacemaker implantation is recommended before discharge 1
- For new bundle branch block: Extended monitoring is warranted with consideration for PPM if persistent 1
Temporary Management While Awaiting PPM:
- For symptomatic bradycardia requiring immediate intervention:
- Atropine can be administered for temporary improvement in heart rate by blocking vagal effects on the AV node 3
- Temporary pacing may be necessary if atropine is ineffective
Monitoring Recommendations
- All patients with new conduction disturbances should be monitored on telemetry with ability to perform emergency pacing if required 1
- For patients with new bundle branch block who don't receive a pacemaker, extended monitoring for at least 14 days is recommended 1
- The monitoring device should have the capacity to notify care teams quickly in the event of delayed high-degree AV block 1
Important Considerations
- Timing of PPM implantation: While specific timing hasn't been formally studied, the median time for pacemaker implantation after transcatheter valve procedures is approximately 3 days 1
- Risk of delayed events: In 29% of patients with new conduction abnormalities, the first episode of high-degree AV block occurs after discharge, with associated risk for syncope 1
- Mortality implications: Conduction disturbances after transcatheter valve procedures are associated with increased mortality risk, and early intervention is critical 2
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Underestimating risk in asymptomatic patients: Asymptomatic heart block can rapidly progress to symptomatic complete heart block 2
- Inadequate monitoring: Discharging with insufficient monitoring may not provide timely intervention if complete heart block develops 2
- Delayed intervention: Waiting too long for spontaneous resolution of conduction abnormalities increases risk of sudden cardiac death 1
- Failing to recognize high-risk features: Pre-existing conduction abnormalities significantly increase risk of requiring permanent pacing 1
By following this algorithm, clinicians can effectively manage bradycardia after TMVR procedures, minimizing the risk of adverse outcomes including sudden cardiac death.