Is cefepime (Cefepime) effective against leptospirosis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 3, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Cefepime's Effectiveness Against Leptospirosis

Cefepime is effective against leptospirosis and provides a significant survival benefit comparable to standard treatments in animal models. 1

Evidence for Cefepime in Leptospirosis

Research demonstrates that cefepime has proven efficacy against Leptospira interrogans in experimental settings:

  • In a hamster model study using Leptospira interrogans serovar Autumnalis, cefepime showed:
    • Dose-dependent effectiveness against leptospirosis
    • Survival benefits comparable to doxycycline (standard treatment)
    • Ability to clear leptospira from target organs (liver, kidney, lung, heart, and spleen)
    • Reduction in tissue injury 1

Current Treatment Recommendations for Leptospirosis

While cefepime has shown effectiveness in experimental models, it's important to note that established clinical guidelines primarily recommend:

  • Penicillin
  • Doxycycline
  • Third-generation cephalosporins (ceftriaxone, cefotaxime)
  • Azithromycin 2, 3

Clinical studies have demonstrated that ceftriaxone (a third-generation cephalosporin) is equally effective as penicillin for severe leptospirosis, with the advantage of once-daily dosing 4.

Cefepime's Antimicrobial Properties

Cefepime is a fourth-generation cephalosporin with:

  • Broad-spectrum activity against gram-negative bacteria
  • Enhanced stability against beta-lactamases
  • Good tissue penetration 5

These properties likely contribute to its effectiveness against Leptospira species, though clinical data in humans is limited compared to other antibiotics.

Clinical Application Considerations

When considering cefepime for leptospirosis treatment:

  1. First-line options: Traditional first-line treatments (penicillin, doxycycline, ceftriaxone) have more clinical evidence supporting their use 2, 3

  2. Potential advantages of cefepime:

    • May be useful when first-line agents are contraindicated
    • Could be beneficial in settings where cefepime is already being used for other indications
    • Particularly valuable in neutropenic patients with suspected leptospirosis 5
  3. Dosing considerations: Based on animal studies, appropriate dosing is essential for efficacy 1

Limitations and Caveats

  • Most human clinical trials for leptospirosis have focused on penicillin, doxycycline, and third-generation cephalosporins rather than cefepime 2
  • The overall certainty of evidence for antibiotic treatment in leptospirosis remains very low according to systematic reviews 2
  • Clinical decision-making should consider local resistance patterns and patient-specific factors

In summary, while cefepime shows promise against leptospirosis in experimental models, clinical evidence supporting its use in humans is limited compared to traditional first-line agents. However, its broad-spectrum activity and favorable safety profile make it a reasonable alternative when standard treatments are contraindicated or unavailable.

References

Research

Antibiotics for treatment of leptospirosis.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2024

Research

Antimicrobial therapy of leptospirosis.

Current opinion in infectious diseases, 2006

Research

Ceftriaxone compared with sodium penicillin g for treatment of severe leptospirosis.

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2003

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.