What is the critical cut-off value for delta shock index indicating severe shock?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 3, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Delta Shock Index Cut-off Values for Shock Assessment

A delta shock index (DSI) value ≥0.1 is the most widely accepted cut-off point for predicting increased mortality, need for blood transfusion, and other adverse outcomes in patients with shock. 1, 2, 3

Understanding Delta Shock Index

Delta shock index represents the change in shock index over time and is calculated as:

  • DSI = Later SI - Initial SI
  • Where SI = Heart Rate / Systolic Blood Pressure

Established Cut-off Values

Based on the available evidence, the following cut-off values have been identified:

  1. Primary Cut-off: DSI ≥0.1

    • Associated with increased mortality (16.6% vs 9.5%) even in hemodynamically stable patients 2
    • Predicts higher need for blood transfusion and ICU length of stay 3
    • Correlates with in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients 1
  2. Higher Risk Thresholds:

    • For postpartum hemorrhage: SI ≥1.143 (initial threshold) and SI ≥1.412 ("critical" threshold) 4
    • For septic shock: SI ≥1.0 after 2 hours of resuscitation (sensitivity 80.8%, specificity 79.2%) 5

Clinical Applications by Patient Population

Trauma Patients

  • DSI >0.1 from field to hospital independently predicts higher mortality (13.3% vs 9.6%) 2
  • In-hospital DSI >0.1 is associated with increased mortality (6.6% vs 2.6%), greater need for blood transfusion, and longer ICU stays 3

Critical Care Patients

  • Positive DSI during ED stay correlates with in-hospital mortality and early mortality (within 48 hours) 1
  • Higher risk subgroups with positive DSI include:
    • Elderly patients
    • Septic patients
    • Patients with triage SBP <100 mmHg
    • Patients with initial SI ≥0.9

Obstetric Patients

  • DSI appears superior to traditional vital signs in predicting postpartum hemorrhage and need for intervention 4

Interpretation in Clinical Context

The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma recommends using shock index to assess the degree of hypovolaemic shock and transfusion requirements 6. While the guidelines don't specify an exact DSI cut-off, they acknowledge that SI ≥0.9-1.0 is associated with increased massive transfusion needs (25%), interventional radiology (6.2%), and operative intervention (14.7%) in bleeding trauma patients 6.

Implementation in Practice

When monitoring patients at risk for shock:

  1. Calculate baseline SI on presentation
  2. Recalculate SI after initial resuscitation/intervention
  3. Calculate DSI (later SI - initial SI)
  4. If DSI ≥0.1:
    • Intensify monitoring
    • Consider escalation of care
    • Prepare for potential interventions (blood products, surgery)
    • Reassess frequently

Pitfalls and Limitations

  • DSI should be used as an adjunct to other clinical parameters, not in isolation
  • Certain patient populations may have altered baseline SI values (e.g., pregnant women, elderly, patients on beta-blockers)
  • A normal SI doesn't exclude significant hemorrhage, especially in younger patients who can maintain blood pressure despite substantial blood loss
  • The specific DSI threshold may need adjustment based on patient characteristics and clinical context

The evidence strongly supports using DSI ≥0.1 as a clinically significant threshold for identifying patients at increased risk of adverse outcomes, regardless of their apparent hemodynamic stability based on traditional vital signs.

References

Research

Shock index and delta-shock index are superior to existing maternal early warning criteria to identify postpartum hemorrhage and need for intervention.

The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians, 2019

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.