What are the long-term occlusion rates for brain aneurysms treated with the WEB (Woven EndoBridge) device?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 3, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Long-Term Occlusion Rates for Brain Aneurysms Treated with WEB Device

The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device demonstrates complete occlusion rates of 51.7% at 1 year, with adequate occlusion (complete occlusion plus neck remnant) reaching approximately 79-88% in long-term follow-up studies, though this is inferior to the durability of surgical clipping. 1, 2, 3

Occlusion Rates by Follow-up Period

Short-term Occlusion (6 months)

  • Complete occlusion achieved in approximately 68% of cases 4
  • Adequate occlusion (complete occlusion plus neck remnant) in up to 88% of cases 1

Medium-term Occlusion (12-18 months)

  • Complete occlusion rates improve to 87-88% at 12-18 months 4, 3
  • French Observatory study showed 51.7% complete occlusion at 1 year 2
  • Neck remnant observed in 27.6% of cases at 1 year 2
  • Aneurysm remnant in 20.7% of cases at 1 year 2

Long-term Stability

  • Of aneurysms completely occluded at 6 months, 90.3% maintained complete occlusion at final follow-up 1
  • 11.5% of initially occluded aneurysms showed some recurrence 1
  • Positive predictive value of complete occlusion at first follow-up was 88.4% 1

Factors Affecting Occlusion Rates

Anatomical Factors

  • Neck size and dome-to-neck ratio significantly associated with aneurysm occlusion (p < 0.05) 4
  • Less favorable results in aneurysms with very large necks 4
  • Aneurysm neck diameter affects occlusion status at follow-up 3
  • Angle between parent artery and aneurysm dome impacts occlusion 3

Technical Factors

  • Undersized WEB device 3
  • WEB shape change 3
  • Ruptured presentation associated with lower occlusion rates 3
  • Immediate contrast agent stagnation may predict better occlusion 4

Comparison to Other Treatment Modalities

Compared to Coil Embolization

  • Traditional coil embolization achieves complete occlusion in only 54% of aneurysms initially 5
  • Recanalization rates for coiled aneurysms range from 20-35% for large aneurysms and up to 59.1% for giant aneurysms 5
  • Small aneurysms with small necks have better outcomes with coiling (5.1% recanalization) 5

Compared to Surgical Clipping

  • Microsurgical clipping provides more definitive long-term treatment 5
  • Only 1.5% of initially obliterated lesions exhibit recurrence after clipping 5
  • Annual regrowth rate for completely clipped aneurysms is 0.1-0.52% 5

Clinical Implications and Follow-up Recommendations

  • Repeat imaging is important even when complete occlusion is achieved in the short term 1
  • Follow-up can be performed using DSA, MRA, or CTA with similar predictive value 1
  • WEB device treatment shows very good safety profile with low morbidity (0.9-3.2%) 3, 2

Caveats and Pitfalls

  • Technical difficulties occur in approximately 12.5% of procedures 4
  • Additional interventions may be needed in 7.6% of cases (stenting, antiplatelet infusion, or additional coiling) 3
  • Aneurysm location may influence success rates, with MCA bifurcation, anterior communicating artery, and basilar tip being common treatment locations 3
  • Incomplete occlusion increases risk of aneurysm growth (up to 49% in incompletely occluded aneurysms) 5
  • Degree of occlusion is an important predictor of hemorrhage risk 5

The WEB device represents an important advancement for treating wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms, but patients should be followed long-term as recurrence can occur even after initial complete occlusion.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.