Are athletic individuals more prone to hearing loss?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 4, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction is Most Common in Athletic Individuals

Athletic individuals are most liable to have exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB), not hearing loss, vision disturbances, or impaired olfactory function. 1

Prevalence of EIB in Athletic Populations

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction is remarkably common among athletes, particularly those participating in certain sports:

  • Elite cross-country skiers: 30-50% prevalence, with some studies reporting up to 78% showing symptoms or bronchial hyperresponsiveness 1
  • Long-distance runners: 17% prevalence 1
  • Speed runners: 8% prevalence 1
  • Winter Olympic athletes: 23% overall prevalence (26% in females, 18% in males) 1
  • Ice skaters: 20-35% prevalence 1

Environmental and Sport-Specific Risk Factors

The high prevalence of EIB in athletes is associated with specific environmental conditions:

  • Cold dry air exposure: Particularly affects winter sport athletes like cross-country skiers 1
  • Poor air quality:
    • Chloramines above swimming pools 1
    • Emissions from ice-cleaning equipment 1
    • Pollution near athletic fields in urban environments 1
  • Duration of exposure: Swimmers with >100 hours of chlorinated pool exposure show higher EIB prevalence 1

Demographic Factors Affecting EIB Risk

Several demographic factors influence EIB prevalence:

  • Sex differences: Female athletes show higher prevalence (26%) compared to males (18%) in winter sports 1
  • Age factors: EIB frequency decreases with increasing age 1
  • Urban vs. rural: Higher prevalence in urban settings (8.9%) compared to rural environments (7%) 1
  • Racial/ethnic differences: African Americans show higher prevalence (13%) compared to white subjects (2%) 1

Why Not Hearing Loss?

While noise exposure can cause hearing loss in various populations, the evidence does not support that athletic individuals are specifically more prone to hearing loss:

  • Age-related hearing loss is more common in males than females, but this is attributed to occupational and noise exposures, not athletic activity 1
  • Hearing loss is associated with aging and is a significant risk factor for other conditions like dementia, depression, and falls 1
  • While a case report describes sudden sensorineural hearing loss after a cycling class 2, this represents an isolated incident rather than a pattern among athletes

Clinical Implications

For healthcare providers working with athletic populations:

  • Screening: Consider screening for EIB in athletes, especially those participating in winter sports, swimming, or sports in polluted environments
  • Prevention: Advise athletes about environmental risk factors that may trigger EIB
  • Treatment: Early intervention for EIB can improve athletic performance and prevent long-term respiratory complications
  • Education: Inform athletes that EIB symptoms may be mistaken for poor conditioning

Conclusion

The evidence clearly indicates that athletic individuals are most liable to have exercise-induced bronchoconstriction, particularly those participating in specific sports with environmental triggers like cold air, chloramines, or air pollution. Healthcare providers should be vigilant about screening for and managing EIB in athletic populations.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.