What are the risks of computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) in pregnant patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 4, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Risks of CTPA in Pregnant Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism

V/Q scanning is safer than CTPA for pregnant patients with suspected PE when the chest X-ray is normal due to significantly lower maternal breast radiation exposure. 1, 2

Radiation Exposure Risks

Maternal Radiation Exposure

  • Breast tissue radiation:

    • CTPA: 10-60 mGy
    • V/Q scan: 0.98-1.07 mGy (approximately 95% lower) 1, 2, 3
  • Lung tissue radiation:

    • CTPA: 39.5 mGy
    • V/Q scan: 5.7-13.5 mGy (approximately 85% lower) 1, 3
  • Effective dose:

    • CTPA: 21 mSv
    • Perfusion scan: 1.04 mSv
    • V/Q scan: 1.29 mSv 3

Fetal Radiation Exposure

  • Fetal radiation exposure is minimal with both V/Q scan and CTPA when proper shielding is used 2
  • For early pregnancy (first two trimesters), CTPA actually results in 50-97% lower fetal doses 4
  • For gestational age >6 months, V/Q SPECT leads to approximately 15% lower fetal dose 4

Cancer Risk

  • Using BEIR VII risk models, a 25-year-old woman undergoing CTPA has a calculated lifetime relative risk of:
    • Breast cancer: 1.011
    • Lung cancer: 1.022 1
  • However, precise quantification of cancer risk from low radiation levels is currently not possible 1

Diagnostic Accuracy and Utility

Non-diagnostic Results

  • V/Q scans in pregnant women have a lower rate of non-diagnostic results (4-7%) compared to the general population 2, 5
  • CTPA has a non-diagnostic rate of 0.9-36% (median 5.9%) in pregnant patients 6

Negative Predictive Value

  • Both modalities have excellent negative predictive values:
    • CTPA: 96-100% (median 100%)
    • V/Q scan: 99-100% (median 100%) 6, 7

Recommended Diagnostic Algorithm

  1. Initial evaluation: Chest radiograph (CXR) as the first radiation-associated procedure 1, 2
  2. If leg symptoms present: Perform bilateral compression ultrasound (CUS) of lower extremities; if positive, begin anticoagulation without further imaging 2
  3. If CXR is normal: Proceed with V/Q scan 1, 2
  4. If CXR is abnormal: Proceed with CTPA 1, 2

Important Considerations

  • D-dimer testing is not recommended in pregnant women due to poor specificity (15%) and inadequate sensitivity (73%) 2
  • Immediate anticoagulation is necessary if PE is confirmed 2
  • For patients in whom there is a high clinical suspicion of PE and low risk of bleeding, anticoagulant therapy is recommended while awaiting diagnostic test results 1
  • MRA is not recommended to rule out PE in pregnancy 1

Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not rely solely on D-dimer to exclude PE in pregnant women 2
  • Do not perform CT venography as an adjunct to CTPA due to increased radiation exposure 1
  • Do not assume that V/Q scan is always the safer option for the fetus - CTPA may be safer in early pregnancy 4
  • Do not delay imaging in unstable patients; empiric therapy and alternate diagnostic strategies should be considered 1

The benefits and risks of diagnostic imaging should be discussed with the pregnant woman, acknowledging the limitations and uncertainties of estimated radiation-induced cancer risk while emphasizing the well-understood clinical benefits of accurate diagnosis 1.

References

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.