Risks of CTPA in Pregnant Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism
V/Q scanning is safer than CTPA for pregnant patients with suspected PE when the chest X-ray is normal due to significantly lower maternal breast radiation exposure. 1, 2
Radiation Exposure Risks
Maternal Radiation Exposure
Breast tissue radiation:
Lung tissue radiation:
Effective dose:
- CTPA: 21 mSv
- Perfusion scan: 1.04 mSv
- V/Q scan: 1.29 mSv 3
Fetal Radiation Exposure
- Fetal radiation exposure is minimal with both V/Q scan and CTPA when proper shielding is used 2
- For early pregnancy (first two trimesters), CTPA actually results in 50-97% lower fetal doses 4
- For gestational age >6 months, V/Q SPECT leads to approximately 15% lower fetal dose 4
Cancer Risk
- Using BEIR VII risk models, a 25-year-old woman undergoing CTPA has a calculated lifetime relative risk of:
- Breast cancer: 1.011
- Lung cancer: 1.022 1
- However, precise quantification of cancer risk from low radiation levels is currently not possible 1
Diagnostic Accuracy and Utility
Non-diagnostic Results
- V/Q scans in pregnant women have a lower rate of non-diagnostic results (4-7%) compared to the general population 2, 5
- CTPA has a non-diagnostic rate of 0.9-36% (median 5.9%) in pregnant patients 6
Negative Predictive Value
- Both modalities have excellent negative predictive values:
Recommended Diagnostic Algorithm
- Initial evaluation: Chest radiograph (CXR) as the first radiation-associated procedure 1, 2
- If leg symptoms present: Perform bilateral compression ultrasound (CUS) of lower extremities; if positive, begin anticoagulation without further imaging 2
- If CXR is normal: Proceed with V/Q scan 1, 2
- If CXR is abnormal: Proceed with CTPA 1, 2
Important Considerations
- D-dimer testing is not recommended in pregnant women due to poor specificity (15%) and inadequate sensitivity (73%) 2
- Immediate anticoagulation is necessary if PE is confirmed 2
- For patients in whom there is a high clinical suspicion of PE and low risk of bleeding, anticoagulant therapy is recommended while awaiting diagnostic test results 1
- MRA is not recommended to rule out PE in pregnancy 1
Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not rely solely on D-dimer to exclude PE in pregnant women 2
- Do not perform CT venography as an adjunct to CTPA due to increased radiation exposure 1
- Do not assume that V/Q scan is always the safer option for the fetus - CTPA may be safer in early pregnancy 4
- Do not delay imaging in unstable patients; empiric therapy and alternate diagnostic strategies should be considered 1
The benefits and risks of diagnostic imaging should be discussed with the pregnant woman, acknowledging the limitations and uncertainties of estimated radiation-induced cancer risk while emphasizing the well-understood clinical benefits of accurate diagnosis 1.