Is ivermectin effective against COVID-19?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 4, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Ivermectin Is Not Effective Against COVID-19

Ivermectin should not be used for the treatment of COVID-19 in either hospitalized or ambulatory patients due to lack of proven efficacy and potential risks. 1, 2

Evidence Against Ivermectin Use

The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) provides clear recommendations regarding ivermectin use for COVID-19:

  • For hospitalized patients: Conditional recommendation against ivermectin use (very low certainty of evidence) 2
  • For ambulatory patients: Strong recommendation against ivermectin use (moderate certainty of evidence) 2

These recommendations are based on substantial evidence showing:

  • No significant improvement in mortality for hospitalized patients (RR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.28,1.03) or outpatients (RR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.50,1.37) 1
  • No meaningful effect on need for mechanical ventilation (RR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.13,1.27) 1
  • No significant improvement in symptom resolution (RR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.69,1.65) 1
  • No reduction in hospitalization rates (RR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.65,1.11) 1

Recent High-Quality Evidence

The most recent high-quality evidence from the PRINCIPLE trial (2024) further confirms ivermectin's lack of efficacy:

  • While there was a statistically significant reduction in time to recovery (2.06 days), the probability of a clinically meaningful effect was only 19.2% 3
  • No reduction in COVID-19-related hospitalizations or deaths (OR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.63 to 1.62) 3
  • No significant difference in long-term outcomes at 6 months 3

The authors concluded that "ivermectin for COVID-19 is unlikely to provide clinically meaningful improvement in recovery, hospital admissions, or longer-term outcomes" and that "further trials of ivermectin for SARS-CoV-2 infection in vaccinated community populations appear unwarranted." 3

Pharmacological Considerations

Despite ivermectin showing in vitro activity against SARS-CoV-2, this occurs at concentrations significantly higher than those achievable in human plasma and lung tissue with standard dosing 2. The concentrations required to reach the in vitro IC50 are not attainable with safe dosing in humans.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  1. Relying on lower-quality evidence: Some early observational studies and meta-analyses suggested benefits 4, 5, but these have been superseded by higher-quality randomized controlled trials that show no meaningful benefit.

  2. Self-medication risks: Patients seeking ivermectin outside medical supervision may obtain veterinary formulations, risking toxicity 1.

  3. Opportunity cost: Using ivermectin may delay implementation of proven therapies with established efficacy 1.

Alternative Evidence-Based Approaches

Instead of ivermectin, clinicians should use treatments with established efficacy:

  • For high-risk outpatients: FDA-approved antivirals or monoclonal antibodies 1
  • For hospitalized patients requiring oxygen: Dexamethasone and other proven therapies 1

Conclusion

The highest quality and most recent evidence demonstrates that ivermectin does not provide clinically meaningful benefits for COVID-19 patients. The IDSA guidelines strongly recommend against its use in outpatient settings and conditionally recommend against its use in hospitalized patients. Clinicians should follow evidence-based guidelines and use treatments with proven efficacy for COVID-19.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.