Management of Anomalous Origin of Right Coronary Artery from Left Coronary Cusp
Surgery or continued observation may be reasonable for asymptomatic patients with anomalous right coronary artery (RCA) arising from the left coronary sinus (LCS) without evidence of ischemia or concerning anatomic features. 1
Diagnostic Evaluation
When anomalous origin of the RCA from the LCS is suspected or discovered:
Comprehensive coronary imaging is essential:
Anatomic and physiological assessment should include evaluation for:
Ischemia evaluation through:
Risk Stratification
Risk assessment should consider:
High-risk features:
Patient factors:
- Age (younger patients have higher risk of SCD)
- Athletic participation/exertional activities
- Prior cardiac events 1
Management Algorithm
For Symptomatic Patients:
- Surgery is recommended (Class I, LOE B-NR) for:
- Patients with symptoms attributable to the anomaly
- Evidence of ischemia on diagnostic testing
- Ventricular arrhythmias 1
For Asymptomatic Patients:
- Decision factors to consider:
With high-risk anatomic features:
- Surgery may be reasonable (Class IIb, LOE B-NR) 1
- Particularly if young and athletic
Without high-risk anatomic features:
Surgical Considerations
When surgery is indicated:
- Surgical unroofing of the intramural segment is the most common approach
- Reimplantation of the coronary artery may be necessary in some cases
- Post-surgical follow-up should include:
Important Caveats
Anomalous RCA vs. LCA risk difference:
- Anomalous left coronary from right sinus carries higher risk of SCD than anomalous RCA from left sinus
- Surgery is more strongly recommended for anomalous left coronary artery (Class IIa) than for anomalous RCA (Class IIb) 1
Normal stress test limitations:
- A normal stress test does not completely exclude risk of SCD
- More sensitive modalities (nuclear perfusion, stress echo) are preferred over stress ECG alone 1
Post-surgical considerations:
- Ischemia may persist after surgical repair
- Continued monitoring is necessary even after intervention 1
Age considerations:
- Younger patients (<35 years) have higher concern for SCD risk
- Management should take age into account 1