Follow-up Protocol for Patients with Carotid Artery Stents
Recommended Surveillance Schedule
After carotid artery stenting, duplex ultrasound surveillance is recommended within the first month, followed by regular monitoring at 6-12 months, and then annually if findings remain stable. 1, 2
The follow-up protocol for a patient who underwent right carotid stenting in 2021 should include:
Imaging Surveillance
- Initial duplex ultrasound should have been performed within 1 month post-procedure to establish baseline status
- Current recommendation (for a patient with stenting in 2021):
- Perform duplex ultrasound now if not done within the past 12 months
- Continue with annual ultrasound surveillance if previous studies showed no significant restenosis
- Increase frequency to every 6 months if any degree of restenosis (>50%) is detected
Duplex Ultrasound Parameters
- Specialized velocity criteria for stented carotids should be used:
- Significant restenosis: Peak-systolic velocity ≥3 m/s and end-diastolic velocity ≥1.4 m/s 2
- Standard velocity criteria used for native carotids may overestimate stenosis in stented vessels
Antiplatelet Therapy Management
Current Recommendations
- After initial carotid stent placement, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and clopidogrel is recommended for at least 1 month 1
- For long-term management (applicable to this patient who had stenting in 2021):
- Single antiplatelet therapy with either aspirin or clopidogrel should be continued indefinitely 1
- The choice between aspirin or clopidogrel should be based on patient tolerance and comorbidities
Dosing
Additional Medical Management
- Intensive lipid-lowering therapy aiming at >50% LDL-C reduction and LDL-C <1.4 mmol/L (55 mg/dL) 1
- Proper blood pressure control to optimize outcomes and reduce risk of stroke 1
- Annual assessment of cardiovascular risk factors and medication adherence 1
- Formal neurologic examination to assess long-term efficacy of carotid revascularization 1, 2
Restenosis Management
If significant restenosis (>70%) is detected:
- In symptomatic patients with recurrent stenosis due to intimal hyperplasia or atherosclerosis, repeat revascularization (CAS or CEA) is reasonable using the same criteria as for initial revascularization 1
- In asymptomatic patients with recurrent stenosis >70%, consider repeat intervention if the stenosis has progressed rapidly or threatens complete occlusion 1
- Reoperative CEA or CAS should not be performed in asymptomatic patients with <70% carotid stenosis that has remained stable over time 1
Common Pitfalls and Considerations
Overestimation of stenosis: Standard velocity criteria used for native carotids may overestimate stenosis in stented vessels; specialized criteria should be used 2
Premature discontinuation of surveillance: Even with stable findings, long-term surveillance is important as late restenosis can occur years after the procedure 1
Inappropriate antiplatelet management: Premature discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy increases risk of thrombotic events; however, prolonged DAPT beyond recommended duration increases bleeding risk without clear benefit 1, 3
Neglecting overall cardiovascular risk: Focus should not be solely on the carotid artery but should include comprehensive management of all cardiovascular risk factors 1
Unnecessary intervention for asymptomatic restenosis: Not all restenoses require intervention, particularly in asymptomatic patients with stable, moderate stenosis 1
By following this structured approach to surveillance and management, the risk of recurrent stroke and other adverse events can be minimized in patients with carotid artery stents.