Is cefdinir (Omnicef) effective against Klebsiella infections?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 4, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Cefdinir's Activity Against Klebsiella

Cefdinir is effective against most community-acquired Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates but should not be used for suspected extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing or hospital-acquired Klebsiella infections.

Spectrum of Activity Against Klebsiella

According to the FDA drug label, cefdinir exhibits in vitro minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 1 mcg/mL or less against ≥90% of Klebsiella pneumoniae strains tested 1. However, the label specifically notes that while this in vitro activity exists, the safety and effectiveness of cefdinir in treating clinical infections due to Klebsiella have not been established in adequate and well-controlled clinical trials.

Research studies provide additional context:

  • A 2005 North American study demonstrated that cefdinir had good activity against community-acquired urinary tract infection pathogens, including Klebsiella species 2
  • In pediatric urinary tract infections, cefdinir showed 95.6% susceptibility against common uropathogens including Klebsiella spp. 3

Important Limitations and Resistance Concerns

Despite its activity against many Klebsiella strains, there are significant limitations:

  • Cefdinir is inactive against most strains of Enterobacter species and has limited activity against ESBL-producing organisms 1
  • The 2017 World Journal of Emergency Surgery guidelines strongly discourage extended use of cephalosporins in settings with high incidence of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae due to selective pressure resulting in emergence of resistance 4
  • Historical evidence shows that Klebsiella can develop resistance to cephalosporins, as documented in a 1993 outbreak of Klebsiella infections resistant to late-generation cephalosporins 5

Clinical Application and Recommendations

When considering cefdinir for Klebsiella infections:

  • For community-acquired, uncomplicated infections: Cefdinir may be appropriate for empiric therapy when susceptibility is likely, particularly in urinary tract infections 2, 3
  • For hospital-acquired infections: Avoid cefdinir as antimicrobial regimens with broader spectra of activity are preferred 4
  • For suspected ESBL-producing strains: Cefdinir is not appropriate; consider carbapenems or newer agents like ceftazidime-avibactam 4

Monitoring and Follow-up

If initiating empiric therapy with cefdinir:

  1. Obtain cultures and susceptibility testing
  2. Reassess when microbiological results are available
  3. Consider de-escalation or changing therapy based on susceptibility results 4

Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not use cefdinir for hospital-acquired Klebsiella infections where resistance rates are higher
  • Be cautious in areas with high ESBL prevalence
  • Remember that in vitro susceptibility doesn't always translate to clinical efficacy
  • Routine susceptibility testing is essential as resistance patterns vary geographically

In conclusion, while cefdinir has activity against many community-acquired Klebsiella strains, its use should be guided by local resistance patterns and patient-specific factors. For serious or hospital-acquired Klebsiella infections, broader-spectrum agents are typically warranted.

References

Research

Susceptibility of recent bacterial isolates to cefdinir and selected antibiotics among children with urinary tract infections.

Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2006

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.