Rosuvastatin vs. Simvastatin for LDL Cholesterol Reduction
Rosuvastatin is significantly more effective than simvastatin in reducing LDL cholesterol levels, with rosuvastatin 10 mg providing approximately 45-50% LDL reduction compared to 30-40% with simvastatin 20-40 mg. 1
Comparative Efficacy in LDL Reduction
Potency Comparison
- Rosuvastatin is classified as a high-intensity statin at doses of 20-40 mg, capable of reducing LDL-C by ≥50% 1
- Simvastatin is classified as a moderate-intensity statin at doses of 20-40 mg, reducing LDL-C by 30-49% 1
- At equivalent doses:
Direct Comparative Studies
- In head-to-head trials, rosuvastatin consistently demonstrates superior LDL-C reduction compared to simvastatin:
- Rosuvastatin 10 mg reduced LDL-C by 49% versus 37% with simvastatin 20 mg (p<0.001) 3
- In the VOYAGER analysis of 32,258 patients, rosuvastatin showed greater LDL-C reduction at all comparable doses 4
- After 52 weeks of treatment with dose titration, more patients achieved their LDL-C goals with rosuvastatin (87.5-88%) compared to simvastatin (72.5%) 5
Impact on Other Lipid Parameters
- Rosuvastatin also demonstrates superior effects on other lipid parameters:
Clinical Outcomes
- The Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' Collaboration found that stronger statins like rosuvastatin lower cardiovascular risk by 45%, compared to 30-36% reductions with less potent statins like simvastatin 1
- For each 1.0 mmol/L (~40 mg/dL) reduction in LDL cholesterol, major vascular events are reduced by 22% and all-cause mortality by 10% 1
- The greater LDL-lowering efficacy of rosuvastatin translates to improved clinical outcomes
Goal Achievement
- Rosuvastatin enables more patients to reach their LDL cholesterol goals than simvastatin:
Safety Considerations
- Both statins have similar safety profiles regarding muscle, renal, and hepatic toxicity 7
- Both statins are associated with a small increased risk of incident diabetes, but the cardiovascular event reduction outweighs this risk 1
- In the JUPITER trial, rosuvastatin 20 mg was associated with a small absolute risk increase for diabetes (1.5% vs 1.2% on placebo over 5 years) while preventing 5.4 vascular events per 255 patients treated 1
Practical Considerations
- Rosuvastatin undergoes minimal metabolism (only 10%) by cytochrome P-450 2C9, potentially resulting in fewer drug interactions compared to simvastatin 7
- Significant drug interactions have been reported with cyclosporine, gemfibrozil, warfarin, and antacids 7
- Rosuvastatin may be preferred in patients requiring greater LDL reduction or those not achieving goals on simvastatin
- Simvastatin may be considered when cost is a significant factor or when moderate LDL reduction is sufficient
Algorithm for Choosing Between Rosuvastatin and Simvastatin
- For patients requiring ≥50% LDL reduction: Choose rosuvastatin 20-40 mg
- For patients requiring 30-49% LDL reduction:
- If closer to 30%: Consider simvastatin 20-40 mg
- If closer to 50%: Consider rosuvastatin 5-10 mg
- For patients with high cardiovascular risk or established ASCVD: Prefer rosuvastatin for more potent LDL reduction
- For patients with significant drug interactions: Consider rosuvastatin for its minimal metabolism
- For patients with cost concerns who need only moderate LDL reduction: Consider simvastatin