What is the next step for a 53-year-old male with chest pain during exercise that is relieved by rest, with normal electrocardiogram (EKG) results?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 5, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Exercise Electrocardiogram is the Appropriate Next Step for a 53-Year-Old Male with Exertional Chest Pain and Normal Resting ECG

For a 53-year-old male with chest pain during exercise that is relieved by rest and has a normal resting ECG, the appropriate next step is Exercise Electrocardiogram (Exercise ECG/Stress Test).

Rationale for Exercise ECG Testing

The patient presents with classic symptoms suggestive of stable angina:

  • Chest pain during exercise
  • Relief with rest
  • Normal resting ECG
  • Age 53 (moderate cardiovascular risk)

These features place him in a low-to-intermediate risk category where exercise ECG is the recommended first-line diagnostic test 1.

Why Exercise ECG is the Best Option:

  1. First-line test for suspected stable angina: The ACC/AHA guidelines recommend exercise ECG as the initial non-invasive stress test for ambulatory patients with normal resting ECG 1.

  2. High diagnostic value: Exercise testing increases diagnostic value when added to resting ECG and cardiac enzyme testing in patients with chest pain 1.

  3. Risk stratification: Exercise ECG provides important prognostic information and helps stratify patients into low, intermediate, or high-risk categories 1.

  4. Cost-effectiveness: Exercise ECG is more cost-effective than proceeding directly to imaging studies in patients with normal resting ECG 1.

Why Other Options Are Not Appropriate:

  • Cardiac enzyme tests (Option A): Not indicated as the first step for stable exertional chest pain. Cardiac enzymes are primarily used for diagnosing acute coronary syndromes, not stable angina 1.

  • Chest X-ray (Option C): Has limited value in diagnosing coronary artery disease in a patient with normal resting ECG and typical anginal symptoms 1.

  • No further test (Option D): Inappropriate given the patient's age and classic anginal symptoms. Guidelines clearly recommend further evaluation with stress testing 1.

Specific Protocol Recommendations:

  • A symptom-limited maximum exercise test using a standard protocol (Bruce or modified Bruce) is recommended 1.

  • The test should be continued until the patient achieves at least 85% of age-predicted maximum heart rate or 6 METs of exertion to ensure adequate diagnostic value 1.

  • The test should be terminated if the patient develops significant chest pain, concerning arrhythmias, significant ST changes, or a drop in blood pressure 1.

Interpretation Considerations:

  • ST-segment depression ≥1 mm during exercise is considered a positive test indicating myocardial ischemia 1.

  • Exercise-induced chest pain, even without ECG changes, has significant predictive value for coronary artery disease 2.

  • The combination of anginal chest pain and ischemic ECG changes during exercise is highly predictive of multivessel coronary disease 2.

Special Considerations:

  • If the exercise ECG is positive or inconclusive, further evaluation with stress imaging (echocardiography or nuclear imaging) would be warranted 1, 3.

  • If the patient is unable to exercise adequately, pharmacological stress testing with imaging would be the alternative 1, 3.

  • A negative exercise test in a patient who achieves adequate workload has excellent negative predictive value (98-99%) 1, 4.

Exercise ECG remains the cornerstone initial test for evaluating stable chest pain in patients with normal resting ECG, providing valuable diagnostic and prognostic information to guide further management.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Myocardial Perfusion Study Authorization Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.