From the Research
Risks of Micropore Particle Technology for Wound Healing
The available evidence suggests that micropore particle technology (MPPT) is a safe and effective treatment for wound healing, including in immunocompromised individuals 1, 2. However, as with any medical treatment, there are potential risks to consider:
- Tissue degeneration: A case report found that polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB) caused tissue degeneration, disruption of the structure of the exposed bone, and the appearance of froth coming through the hip bone, whereas MPPT promoted wound healing without affecting the bone or causing side effects 3.
- Cytotoxic properties: The same case report suggests that the cytotoxic properties of antiseptics, such as PHMB, can disrupt tissues and tissue regeneration, highlighting the importance of choosing a safe and effective treatment like MPPT 3.
- Unknown long-term effects: While the available evidence suggests that MPPT is safe and effective in the short-term, there is limited information on the long-term effects of this treatment 1, 2, 4, 3, 5.
- Potential interactions: As with any medical treatment, there is a potential for interactions with other medications or treatments, which should be carefully considered when using MPPT 1, 2, 4, 3, 5.
Comparison to Other Treatments
MPPT has been compared to other treatments, such as Gentaxane and iodine/DMSO, and has been found to be more effective in promoting wound healing and reducing hospitalization duration 5. Additionally, MPPT has been found to be safe and effective in treating wounds with antimicrobial-resistant infections 1.
Patient Population
MPPT has been studied in various patient populations, including those with spinal cord injuries, diabetic foot ulcers, and venous leg ulcers, and has been found to be effective in promoting wound healing in these populations 1, 2, 5.